Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 326183

This tag is for questions relating to Hilbert Space, a vector space equipped with an inner product, an operation that allows defining lengths and angles, and the space is complete. It arises naturally and frequently in mathematics and physics, typically as infinite-dimensional function spaces having the property that it is complete. Applies also to pre-Hilbert spaces, rigged Hilbert spaces, and spaces with negative norm or zero-norm states.

0 votes
Accepted

Some questions on extraction of quantum probabilities from vectors and Hilbert space?

In the framework of textbook quantum mechanics, states are abstract vectors $\lvert \psi \rangle$ of a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$. More technically, a state is an equivalence class of vectors defined …
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 3,295
4 votes
3 answers
886 views

Is the zero vector necessary to do quantum mechanics?

Textbook quantum mechanics describes systems as Hilbert spaces $\mathcal{H}$, states as unit vectors $\psi \in \mathcal{H}$, and observables as operators $O: \mathcal{H} \to \mathcal{H}$. Ultimately, …
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 3,295
0 votes
1 answer
130 views

What are the distinct mathematical formalisms of quantum mechanics?

Consider the physical theory called non-relativistic quantum mechanics. What are the distinct mathematical formalisms for this physical theory? That is, different mathematical frameworks for this phys …
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 3,295
2 votes
0 answers
45 views

Simple way to see if $n$-qubit Hamiltonian has no interaction terms?

Consider a system of $n$-qubits. The Hilbert space is $\mathcal{H} \cong \mathbb{C}^2 \otimes ... \otimes \mathbb{C}^2$. Fix each tensor factor $\mathbb{C}^2$ to have the $\sigma_z$ vector space basis …
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 3,295
0 votes

The abstract state of a particle

At a high level, a state of a quantum system is a vector $\lvert \psi \rangle$ of a complex vector space $\mathcal{H}$. If you recall the definition of a vector space, a vector need not be a column of …
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 3,295
3 votes

Is maximal entanglement basis independent?

Let $\mathcal{H}$ with dimension $\dim \mathcal{H} = 2^n$ where $n \in \mathbb{N}$ be a Hilbert space describing your system of interest. This could be a Hilbert space for a system of $n$ qubits, for …
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 3,295
2 votes
0 answers
95 views

Is Sakurai's derivation of the Lippmann-Schwinger equation correct?

I am using Sakurai's Modern Quantum Mechanics 3rd ed. The following is from the beginning of chapter 6. The defining equation for the $T$-matrix is $$\langle \vec{k}' \lvert U_I(t, t_0) \lvert \vec{k} …
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 3,295
2 votes
0 answers
62 views

Does Sakurai's definition of $S$-matrix assume a particular type of scattering?

I am using Sakurai's Modern Quantum Mechanics 3ed. In chapter 6, Sakurai defines the $T$-matrix via the equation $$\langle \vec{k}' \lvert U_I(t, t_0) \lvert \vec{k} \rangle = \delta_{k'k} - \frac{i}{ …
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 3,295
2 votes
0 answers
93 views

Computing Fubini-Study expectation values over $\mathbb{C}P^n$

In finite-dimensional textbook quantum mechanics, we postulate that states of our system are rays in a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$ with dimension $\dim{\mathcal{H}} = n+1$ where $n \in \mathbb{N}$, in …
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 3,295
1 vote

How to find the expectation value of momentum operator?

I am going to rewrite your formulas because the placement of some of your quantities is personally confusing. $$\left \langle \hat{p} \right \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx \ \psi^{*}(x)\left(-i\h …
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 3,295
2 votes

Derivative of $c(t)$ in Adiabatic Approximation

You are incorrectly assuming that the instantaneous eigenstates $\lvert n; t\rangle$ satisfy the Schrödinger equation. Instead, they are merely defined by the equation $$H(t)\lvert n;t\rangle = E_n(t) …
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 3,295
5 votes
2 answers
654 views

What is the Majorana stellar representation?

One can geometrically visualize spin-1/2 states using the Bloch sphere. A natural question then is: "Can one geometrically visualize spin-$s$ states using a similar object to the Bloch sphere?" It see …
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 3,295
8 votes
Accepted

What is the Majorana stellar representation?

The Majorana stellar representation is a way to geometrically visualize pure spin-s states. In essence, the Majorana stellar representation 1) establishes a bijection between states of Hilbert space a …
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 3,295
1 vote

Time evolution of operators in the Heisenberg picture

The crux of the matter is this, the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures are both valid because they both yield the same observable results. That is to say, the amplitude $$\langle \psi\lvert U^\dagger …
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 3,295
1 vote
Accepted

How does Weinberg definition of particle states from standard momentum work?

I believe 3. is literally a definition. That is, while the unitary representation of an arbitrary homogenous Lorentz transformation $U(\Lambda)$ acts as: $$U(\Lambda) \Psi_{\rho, \sigma} = \sum_{\sigm …
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 3,295

15 30 50 per page