Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with wavelength
Search options not deleted
user 122700
The wavelength of a sinusoidal wave is the spatial period of the wave—the distance over which the wave's shape repeats, and the inverse of the spatial frequency or wavenumber. Determined by considering the distance between consecutive corresponding points of the same phase, such as crests. Use for wavenumber, wavelength, frequency.
2
votes
2
answers
406
views
Hypothetical maximum energy of a single photon [duplicate]
My idea was, that there might be restriction for the minimum wavelength and I thought about the Planck length: $1.616 · 10^{−35}$ m
So my hypothetical photons energy would be:
$$E=hf=\frac{hc}{\lambda … J s m}}{\text{s m}}$$
which gives me the value: $1.23*10^{10}$ J
Is this the maximum amount of energy that a single photon can have, or is the concept of using the planck length as minimal possible wavelength …
- 121