Linked Questions

25 votes
3 answers
8k views

Self-energy, 1PI, and tadpoles

I'm having a hard time reconciling the following discrepancy: Recall that in passing to the effective action via a Legendre transformation, we interpret the effective action $\Gamma[\phi_c]$ to be the ...
QuantumDot's user avatar
  • 6,511
12 votes
2 answers
11k views

How to correctly understand these "1-particle-irreducible insertions"?

In QED, when dealing with the vacuum polarization and the photon propagator, some authors like Peskin & Schroeder introduce the so-called "1-particle irreducible" diagrams. These are defined as: ...
Gold's user avatar
  • 37.4k
19 votes
2 answers
3k views

Defining quantum effective/proper action (Legendre transformation), existence of inverse (field-source)?

Given a Quantum field theory, for a scalar field $\phi$ with generic action $S[\phi]$, we have the generating functional $$Z[J] = e^{iW[J]} = \frac{\int \mathcal{D}\phi e^{i(S[\phi]+\int d^4x J(x)\...
Thomas's user avatar
  • 533
7 votes
3 answers
982 views

How can the mass of an unstable composite particle become complex?

To show where the resonances in cross sections come from, one usually considers the exact propagator in the interacting theory, which for a scalar is $$iG(p^2)=\frac{i}{p^2-m_R^2+\Sigma(p^2)+i\epsilon}...
F.Burton's user avatar
  • 163
3 votes
3 answers
1k views

Why only need to change external legs in minimal-subtraction renormalization?

For the Ch. 27 in book QFT by Srednicki, in the modified minimal-subtraction renormalization scheme($\overline{MS}$), the residue for pole at $-m_{ph}^2$ is $R$, instead of one. However, I can not ...
Merlin Zhang's user avatar
  • 1,652
5 votes
2 answers
347 views

What is, diagrammatically, the 2-vertex $\Gamma^{(2)}$?

I know that the 2-vertex $\Gamma^{(2)}$ is the second derivative of the effective action, but I fail to see what it is diagrammatically: is it the truncated 1PI diagram? The non-truncated one? If this ...
Mauro Giliberti's user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
529 views

Disconnected Feynman diagram for the 2-point correlation function

In Peskin&Schroeder they explain in a graphical way why the Schwinger functional generates only connected diagrams. However I don‘t understand why they get 2 diagrams since the first diagram is ...
Silas's user avatar
  • 405
5 votes
1 answer
349 views

Fourier transformation of the inverse Klein-Gordon propagator

On Peskin & Schroeder's QFT, page 30, the scalar field propagator as the retarded Green function is defined as $$(\partial^2+m^2)D_R(x-y)=-i\delta^4(x-y) \tag{2.56}$$ The Fourier transformation is ...
Daren's user avatar
  • 1,461
3 votes
1 answer
815 views

The LSZ formula in Peskin and Schroeder

I'm working on the Eq.(7.57) in Peskin(page 236). So I try to verify it with LSZ formula. According to Eq (7.42) So $\mathcal{M}(p \rightarrow p)=-Z M^{2}\left(p^{2}\right)$ In this I have two ...
sky's user avatar
  • 179
5 votes
1 answer
374 views

Resummation of single class of diagrams vs all 1PI diagrams

Maggiore considers on page 136 in Section 5.6 Renormalization in the book A Modern Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, the resummation of tadpole diagrams as its own individual geometric series to ...
Ghorbalchov's user avatar
  • 2,152
2 votes
2 answers
532 views

Exact propagator - 1PI diagrams

Above diagram can be written in terms of series: $$i\Delta = -\frac{i}{p^2 + m^2} + \Big(-\frac{i}{p^2 + m^2}\Big)(i\Pi)\Big(-\frac{i}{p^2 + m^2}\Big)+ \Big(-\frac{i}{p^2 + m^2}\Big)(i\Pi)\Big(-\frac{...
Monopole's user avatar
  • 3,494
1 vote
1 answer
552 views

Proof of 1-particle irreducible (1PI) diagrams

If we split the effective action into $$Γ[Φ] =\frac{1}2ΦiG_0^{-1}Φ + Γ^{int} [Φ]\tag{1}$$ we can show that the full propagator is given by $$G= i[iG − Σ]^{-1}\tag{2}$$ With $$Σ=-Γ_{ΦΦ}^{int} [Φ]\tag{3}...
amilton moreira's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
549 views

Combinatorics geometric series for connected two-point function

In this answer Proof of geometric series two-point function it is said: Now what about the coefficients in front of each Feynman diagram? Due to the combinatorics/factorization involved it ...
amilton moreira's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
163 views

Geometric series of two point function and self energy

This question is related to this question Proof of geometric series two-point function. Suppose we have a graph $A$ with a symmetry factor $s_1$. According to Srednicki (chapter 9, eq. (9.13)) for a ...
amilton moreira's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
121 views

Understanding $W^{(n)}$, $\Gamma^{(n)}$, and $\Sigma$ in Feynman diagrams

In quantum field theory (specifically $\phi^4$ theory), $W$ is the sum of all connected Feynman diagrams and the effective action $\Gamma$ is the sum of all 1PI Feynman diagrams. They are related by a ...
CBBAM's user avatar
  • 3,992