0
$\begingroup$

If I use $ \boldsymbol{J} = \boldsymbol{L} + \boldsymbol{S} = \boldsymbol{L} + \frac{\boldsymbol{\sigma}}{2} $, then \begin{align*} (\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{J}) (\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{J} - 1) & = (\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{L} + \frac{3}{2}) (\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{L} + \frac{3}{2} - 1) \\ & = (\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{L})^{2} + 2 \boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{L} + \frac{3}{4} \\ & = L^{2} + \boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{L} + \frac{3}{4} \\ & = L^{2} + 2 \boldsymbol{S} \cdot \boldsymbol{L} + S^{2} \\ & = (\boldsymbol{L} + \boldsymbol{S})^{2} \\ & = J^{2} \end{align*} where \begin{align*} (\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{L})^{2} = L^{2} + i\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot (\boldsymbol{L} \times \boldsymbol{L}) = L^{2} - \boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{L} \end{align*} but if I use \begin{align*} (\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{J})^{2} = J^{2} - \boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{J} \end{align*} then I have \begin{align*} (\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{J}) (\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{J} - 1) & = (\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{J})^{2} - \boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{J} \\ & = J^{2} - 2\boldsymbol{\sigma} \cdot \boldsymbol{J} \\ & \neq J^{2} \end{align*} So which equation is right, and what wrong with another equation?

Thanks by LiZ.

$\endgroup$
0

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

Your first expression is correct, the second one is wrong. It is true that $$ (\vec{\sigma}\cdot\vec{L})^2=L^2-\vec{\sigma}\cdot\vec{L} \ , $$ but you cannot generalize this to $\vec{J}$: $$ (\vec{\sigma}\cdot\vec{J})^2\neq J^2-\vec{\sigma}\cdot\vec{J} \ , $$ because $\vec{S}=\vec{\sigma}/2$ and $[\sigma_i,\sigma_j]=2i\epsilon_{ijk}\sigma_k\neq0$, so $ (\vec{\sigma}\cdot\vec{J})^2\neq\sigma_i\sigma_kJ_iJ_k$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. It is I who take it for granted think that if the same index of vector commute with Pauli matrix is ok. $\endgroup$
    – liZ
    Commented Nov 8 at 16:40
-1
$\begingroup$

Your calculations are inconsistent because you need to rather assume in a simultaneous eigenspace of $J^2,S^2,L^2$ (which commute): $$ J^2 =j(j+1) \quad L^2=l(l+1) \quad S^2 = s(s+1) $$ From there, you can compute spin orbit coupling: $$ L\cdot S = \frac12(J^2-L^2-S^2) = \frac12[j(j+1)-l(l+1)-s(s+1)] $$ as well as: $$ S\cdot J = S^2+S\cdot J = \frac12[j(j+1)-l(l+1)+s(s+1)] $$ so your quantity is (both you results were wrong): $$ (\sigma\cdot J)[(\sigma\cdot J)-1] = [j(j+1)-l(l+1)+s(s+1)][j(j+1)-l(l+1)+s(s+1)-1] $$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.