3
$\begingroup$

In the book "String theory and M-theory" by Becker, Becker and Schwarz, the author says that the Nambu-Goto action $$S_{NG}=-T\int d\sigma\, \tau \sqrt{(\dot{X}\cdot X')^2 -\dot{X}^2X'^2}$$ is equivalent to the sigma model action $$S_{\sigma}=-\frac{1}{2}T\int d^2 \sigma\, \sqrt{-h}\,h^{\alpha \beta}\partial_{\alpha}X\cdot \partial_{\beta}X$$ where $h_{\alpha\beta}$ is an auxiliary world-sheet metric and energy-momentum tensor is zero: $$T_{\alpha\beta}=-\frac{2}{T}\frac{1}{\sqrt{-h}}\frac{\delta S}{\delta h^{\alpha \beta}}=0.$$

Where this definition $T_{\alpha\beta}=-\frac{2}{T}\frac{1}{\sqrt{-h}}\frac{\delta S}{\delta h^{\alpha \beta}}$ come from? The definition of energy-momentum tensor was $$T^{\mu}_{\nu}=\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_{\mu}\phi)}\partial_{\nu}\phi-\mathcal{L}\delta^{\mu}_{\nu}.$$

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The definition of the stress tensor has always been what you've put in your title (up to a normalization). When that definition is applied to the action $S = \int d^d x \sqrt{-g} {\cal L} ( \phi , \partial_\mu \phi )$, then you get your final formula. $\endgroup$
    – Prahar
    Commented Sep 10 at 13:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This definition also appears in books on general relativity -- I think it is likely to be better explained in a good book on GR than a book on string theory, since a string theory book will probably assume you have a solid grounding in GR. As an example, Carroll's book discusses this definition. $\endgroup$
    – Andrew
    Commented Sep 10 at 14:43
  • $\begingroup$ @Prahar I got it now. Thank you so much. $\endgroup$
    – Mahtab
    Commented Sep 10 at 14:45
  • $\begingroup$ @Andrew Appreciate your help. I understood. You are right. Thank you for the link. $\endgroup$
    – Mahtab
    Commented Sep 10 at 14:47

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Because by construction, it satisfies 3 key properties one expects from the energy-momentum tensor:

  1. It is a symmetric rank-2 tensor,
  2. By an infinitesimal coordinate transformation $x^\mu\to x^\mu+\xi^\mu$, you can show that it is conserved in the sense that $\nabla_\mu T^{\mu\nu}=0$,
  3. In a gravitational setup, in which the metric is a dynamical variable, it correctly identifies the energy-momentum tensor as a source of gravity. In other words, it is consistent with Einstein equations.

These are nicely explained in section 6.2.4 of Padmanabhan's book on Gravitation.

Note that this definition could in principle differ from a canonical definition based on the Noether's procedure, in which the energy-momentum tensor is identified with the generator of Poincaré translations. This happens for example for Maxwell's action. However, the difference is a total derivative term which can be taken into account by the Belinfante–Rosenfeld procedure.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Dear @AliSerak I really appreciate your nice explanation. I got it now. Thanks very much. $\endgroup$
    – Mahtab
    Commented Sep 10 at 14:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.