2
$\begingroup$

I have been trying to prove the relations between specific heats at constant magnetization and magnetic field H, i.e. $C_H$ and $C_M$. I know that the relationship between $C_V$ and $C_V$ is given as $$\kappa_T (C_P-C_V) = TV\alpha_P^2$$ and I want to prove similar relations for magnetic systems. Problem is, I have been stuck at it for the past two days and am getting increasingly exasperated.

How do I go about doing this? No matter what I try, I end up getting stuck somewhere. My starting point is to write entropy as $S\equiv S(T,V,M)$ but even that leaves me nowhere.

Is there a source I can refer to that lists out the correct formulae for the four thermodynamic potentials in a magnetic system. I know that $dU=TdS-PdV+HdM$, and I want to find such equations for all thermodynamic potentials.

$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

Neglecting pressure and volume, your energy is: $$ dU=TdS+HdM $$ You can therefore apply the same method by formally substituting $P\to-H$ and $V\to M$. The analogue for enthalpy is: $$ \mathcal H = U-HM \\ d\mathcal H = TdS-MdH $$ and define the respective heat capacities: $$ C_M = \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial T}\right)_M \quad C_H = \left(\frac{\partial \mathcal H}{\partial T}\right)_H $$ By analogy, you can immediately write Mayer’s relation: $$ C_H-C_M=T\frac{\alpha^2}{\chi}\\ \alpha = \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial T}\right)_H \quad \chi= \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial H}\right)_T $$ with $\chi$ magnetic susceptibility replacing compressibility and $\alpha$ magnetic "expansion" (there must be a more common name in the literature) replacing thermal expansion.

The proof is the same, the goal is to express $C_M$ in terms of $T,H$. You just need to use Maxwell's relation, i.e. the existence of state functions. For this, it is best to rewrite the expressions of heat capacities: $$ C_M = T\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_M \quad C_H = T\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_H $$ Using the chain rule: $$ \left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_M = \left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_H+\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial H}\right)_T\left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial T}\right)_M $$ From Maxwell's relation on free enthalpy: $$ G = \mathcal H-TS \quad dG = -SdT-MdH \\ \left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial H}\right)_T = \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial T}\right)_H $$ Then, using: $$ dM = \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial T}\right)_HdT+\left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial H}\right)_TdH \\ \left(\frac{\partial H}{\partial T}\right)_M = -\frac{\left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial T}\right)_H}{\left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial H}\right)_T} $$ so you get: $$ T\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_M = T\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_H-T\frac{\left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial T}\right)_H}{\left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial H}\right)_T}\left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial T}\right)_H $$ Substituting the definition of the various coefficients, you recover Mayer's relation.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much. That is a great answer. I think a major reason I was getting lost is the lack of correct definitions. For instance, I was able to arrive at partial M over partial T on the RHS. However, I was unaware that alpha is defined like that. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 20 at 2:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.