0
$\begingroup$

Let's say that we have a discrete lattice with $N$ sites. Let's label the site by the index $i$.

Let's say that we have the operators $a_i$ and $a_i^\dagger$ which correspond to the creation and annihilation of magnons. We have

$$\hat{N}=\sum_i a_i^\dagger a_i,$$ where $\hat{N}$ is the number operator.

Let's say we want to use a continuum limit for the Hamiltonian (rather than a discrete sum. The Hamiltonian consists of terms that are quadratic in these operators) by using continuous creation/annihilation operators $\phi^\dagger(x)$ and $\phi(x)$ respectively, which also satisfy the commutation relations for bosons. Then, we need to make the following substitutions: $$a_i^\dagger \to \sqrt{a} \phi^\dagger(x),$$ $$a_i \to \sqrt{a} \phi(x),$$ where the $\sqrt{a}$ is a result of the normalization by conserving the total particle number:

$$\hat{N}=\sum_i a_i^\dagger a_i = \int dx \phi^\dagger(x)\phi(x).$$

I still don't understand this normalization factor of $\sqrt{a}$. How does the conservation of total particle number when moving from sum to integral exactly require this normalization factor of $\sqrt{a}$? It still doesn't make quite sense to me, even with the above explanation.

$a$ is the lattice constant/spacing here. Furthermore, we have:

$\phi(x+a) \approx \phi(x) + a\frac{d\phi}{dx}$

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ What is $\sqrt a$ supposed to mean? I mean it cannot be any constant, no? Do you have a reference for all of this? $\endgroup$ Commented May 8 at 13:04
  • $\begingroup$ These were taken from lecture notes so I don't have a reference, I added all the necessary context available to me, including what is meant with $a$. $\endgroup$
    – Stallmp
    Commented May 8 at 13:06
  • $\begingroup$ Can you ask your lecturer? Anyway: When going from discrete sums to integrals (for a finite volume), pre-factors indeed occur. $\endgroup$ Commented May 8 at 13:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I assume that $a$ is meant to be the lattice spacing, although I might suggest using if different symbol from the one you use for the creation/annihilation operators $\endgroup$ Commented May 8 at 13:11
  • $\begingroup$ I think you're right, I will add it to the post. $\endgroup$
    – Stallmp
    Commented May 8 at 13:14

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

If $x= na$ then write $\sqrt a\phi(na)= a_n$ etc, $$ \sum_n a^\dagger_n a_n \sim \int \phi^\dagger (na) \phi(na) adn= \int \phi^\dagger( x) \phi(x) dx, $$ the "$\sim$" being the usual approximation of a sum of slowly varying things by an integral.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ But how do you go from $\sum_n a_n^\dagger a_n$ to $\int \phi^\dagger(na) \phi(na) adn$? This approximation doesn't make sense to me and where it comes from. $\endgroup$
    – Stallmp
    Commented May 8 at 13:59
  • $\begingroup$ A continuum limit means that all momenta are small compared to $a^{-1}$, so that the matrix elements of the $a_n$ are slowly varying functions of $n$. This is why the sum can be approximated by the integral. $\endgroup$
    – mike stone
    Commented May 8 at 14:02
  • $\begingroup$ But it doesn't make sense to write $x = na$ right? Because $x$ is supposed to be a continuous parameter but $na$ is discrete since $n$ is an integer and $a$ a fixed constant. $\endgroup$
    – Stallmp
    Commented May 8 at 14:12
  • $\begingroup$ @Stallmp Yes, $x$ is discrete, but the point is that for $a\to 0$, its possible values become closer and closer, and the approximation then is to treat it as a continuous variable (and the sum as an integral). $\endgroup$ Commented May 8 at 14:20
  • $\begingroup$ Okay I get it now. It was just confusing since there were many steps skipped, but the trick is to convert the variable from $n$ to $x$ in the sum, then multiplying by $a/a$ where $\Delta x = a$, letting $a \to 0$ and then converting the sum to an integral. Then finally defining the $\phi$ variable to cancel the $1/a$ factor outside the integral. $\endgroup$
    – Stallmp
    Commented May 8 at 14:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.