1
$\begingroup$

Consider a Lagrangian $L(\phi)$ for a field $\phi$ (assume it is a free real scalar for simplicity). Then the time ordered propagator can be expressed as a path integral $$ \langle\Omega|T\{ \phi(x) \phi(x') \}|\Omega\rangle = \int D\phi\ \phi(x) \phi(x') e^{i \int L} . $$ This is a standard result from Zee's textbook for example.

We know that the time ordered propagator should obey the equation of motion $$ ( -\Box_x^2 + m^2 )\langle\Omega|T\{ \phi(x) \phi(x') \}|\Omega\rangle = \delta(x - x') \ . $$ I would like to check that the path integral representation of the propagator satisfies the equation of motion.

However, applying $\Box_x$ to the path integral on the RHS of the above, does not seem to give me the right equation. In fact, since $( -\Box_x^2 + m^2 )\phi(x) =0$ it seems like $$ ( -\Box_x^2 + m^2 ) \int D\phi\ \phi(x) \phi(x') e^{i \int L} = 0 $$ This is obviously wrong, but I don't see why. Is it because of the end points on the integral?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/296309/2451 , physics.stackexchange.com/q/359961/2451 and links therein. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Mar 15 at 14:58
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It’s potentially worth stating OP’s mistake explicitly: the field $\phi$ in the path integral is an integration variable, and does not a priori satisfy the equation of motion; heuristically, the path integral instructs the user to integrate over all possible fields, not just those satisfying the classical EoM. $\endgroup$
    – Zack
    Commented Mar 15 at 15:39

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Let $P(\Phi)$ be a polynomial in a set of field variables $\Phi= \{\phi_1(x), \phi_2(x),\ldots\}$, and consider a correlation function $$ \langle{P(\Phi)}\rangle= \frac 1 Z \int d[\Phi] P(\Phi)e^{-S[\Phi]}. $$ The functional integral over $\Phi$ should be unaffected by a linear shift in the integration variables $\phi_i(x) \to \phi_i(x) +\delta \phi_i(x)$. We therefore have
$$ 0= \frac 1 Z \int d[\Phi] \left\{\int \delta \phi_i(x) \left(\frac{\delta P}{\delta \phi_i(x)} - P(\Phi) \frac{\delta S}{\delta \phi_i(x)}\right)d^d x\right\} e^{-S[\Phi]}, $$ and hence $$ 0=\left\langle \int \delta \phi_i(x) \left(\frac{\delta P}{\delta \phi_i(x)} - P(\Phi) \frac{\delta S}{\delta \phi_i(x)}\right)d^d x\right\rangle $$ for any $\delta\phi_i(x)$. So, for each point $x$ and field $\phi_i$, we have $$ \left\langle \frac{\delta P}{\delta \phi_i(x)}\right\rangle= \left\langle P(\Phi) \frac{\delta S}{\delta \phi_i(x)}\right\rangle, $$ which is the quantum counterpart of the classical equation of motion$$ \frac{\delta S}{\delta \phi_i(x)}=0. $$

When the fields in $P= \phi(x_1)\phi(x_2) \cdots \phi(x_n)$ are bosonic $$ \frac{\delta P}{\delta \phi(x)}= \sum_{k=1}^n \delta(x-x_k)\phi(x_1) \phi(x_2)\cdots \widehat{\phi(x_k)} \cdots \phi(x_n), $$ where the hat denotes the omission of that factor.

In your case the functional derivative $\frac{\delta S}{\delta \phi_i(x)}$ is the KG equation and you get your equation by taking $P= \phi(x)$ to be a one point function.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.