For a scenario in which an object is sliding down an inclined plane, its motion opposed by a kinetic friction force, it seems to me that maintaining a constant velocity should be impossible given these assumptions:
- The maximum coefficient of static friction is greater than the coefficient of kinetic friction.
- When the object is at rest on the incline, the force of static friction is at its maximum value, and only a nudge is required to set it into motion. Thus, the angle of the incline in both cases (at rest and at constant velocity) should be (practically) the same.
- There is no air resistance to be accounted for.
With this considered, wouldn't both scenarios yield the same value of tanθ (θ being the angle of the incline) for the coefficient of friction? Wouldn't this then break the assumption that max coefficient of static friction is greater than that of kinetic friction?
I've been puzzling over this because the whole "object sliding down an incline with constant speed" seems to be a common problem-solving scenario for introductory mechanics classes. However, with the assumptions I've listed above, I feel like this should be a theoretically impossible situation, unless, of course, one of the assumptions is wrong.