2
$\begingroup$

Consider a free theory and let $P^\mu = (H, \mathbf{P})$ be the 4-momentum operator. Since $P_\mu P^\mu = m^2$ is a Lorentz scalar, we get the relation $H^2 - |\mathbf{P}|^2 = m^2$. Here $H$ must be an eigenvalue $E$ of the Hamiltonian so that the momentum is on shell. With this requirement we get that the spectrum of the one particle state is all combinations of scalars $E$ and vectors $\mathbf{P}$ such that $E^2 - |\mathbf{P}|^2 = m^2$, which is a hyperboloid. We also have that the vacuum is the point at the origin. This describes the spectrum of $P^\mu$ for systems consisting of $n = 0, 1$ particles.

Assuming the above is all correct, I am unclear on why states consisting of two or more particles form a continuum in a rest frame with zero momenta. This is stated in Peskin & Schroeder and visualized in Figure 7.1 (page 213). A similar question was asked in another question (Why do the eigenvalues of the 4-momentum operator organize themselves into hyperboloids?), from which I know this somehow follows from boosts and Lorentz invariance, but I still do not fully understand why there is a continuum.

Can anyone explain why there is a continuum for $n \geq 2$ states and why there is a "bound state" between the $n = 1$ and $n = 2$ states in the figure? In a rest frame with two particle, why does $E^2 - |\mathbf{P}|^2 = 4m^2$?

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Well, if you have two particles, then the energy of a "combined" particle can be lower than the sum of the rest energies of both particles, hence there can be bound state, which are expected below $2m$. BTW: Without the book (at hand) it might be hard to follow. It might be worth to add e.g. a sketch of the relevant figures... (I don't know the rules regarding copy-pasting graphs from books here on PSE)# $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 6 at 19:33
  • $\begingroup$ @TobiasFünke Why/how can the combined particle have energy lower than their sum? If the moderators are ok with me posting a picture of the figure I will add it to my post. $\endgroup$
    – CBBAM
    Commented Feb 6 at 19:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well, this then means that it takes energy to separate the particles (and hence the name: bound states). Take e.g. the hydrogen atom or molecules in general. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 6 at 19:42
  • $\begingroup$ @TobiasFünke Oh yes I see now, thank you. But since this is a free theory wouldn't such a state necessarily have minimum energy $4m^2$ since there is no interaction? $\endgroup$
    – CBBAM
    Commented Feb 6 at 19:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Don't they talk about interacting theories?! $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 6 at 19:47

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

To see why there is a continuous spectrum for multiparticle states look at a n-particle state with zero total momentum, i.e. \begin{equation*} \mathbf{P} = \sum_i \mathbf{p}_i = 0. \end{equation*} The energy of this state is then just \begin{equation*} E = \sum_i \sqrt{m^2 + \mathbf{p}_i^2}. \end{equation*} Since the $\mathbf{p}_i^2$ can be chosen arbitrarily as long as they still sum to 0, this gives you a continuum. This energy has a lower bound of $E = 2\sqrt{m}$ corresponding to two particles at rest so the contiuum starts there.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! $\endgroup$
    – CBBAM
    Commented Feb 6 at 21:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.