0
$\begingroup$

What is the expression for the covariant derivative of a Weyl spinor?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Let $\mu$ be a spacetime index, $a,b$ be an internal space indices and $\alpha,\beta$ be spinor indices. The covariant derivative has the form: $$ \nabla_\mu \psi_\alpha = \partial_\mu \psi_\alpha + \frac{1}{4}\, \omega_{\mu ab} (\sigma^{ab})_\alpha{}^\beta \psi_\beta $$ where $$ \sigma^{ab} = \frac{1}{4} [ \sigma^a {\bar \sigma}^b - \sigma^b {\bar \sigma}^a ] $$ with $$ \sigma^a = ( I_{2\times2} , \sigma_1 , \sigma_2 , \sigma_3 ) , \qquad {\bar \sigma}^a = ( -I_{2\times2} , \sigma_1 , \sigma_2 , \sigma_3 ) . $$ The signs and factors of $2$ and $4$ are all convention based and I'm not certain I have the right factors in this answer. Your homework is to figure out the right factors.

HINT: With the right factors, we must have $$ [ \nabla_\mu , \nabla_\nu ] \psi_\alpha = \# R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} e^\rho_c e^\sigma_d ( \sigma^{cd} )_\alpha{}^\beta \psi_\beta $$

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! I am supposed to follow the convention of Wess and Bagger. Your definition of $\sigma^{ab}$ matches that of Wess & Bagger (eq. A.14). But I'm not sure how to check if the factor of $\frac14$ in your first equation matches with the convention of Wess and Bagger. There is a definition of the covariant derivative below eq. (19.20). But that uses $\omega_{\mu\alpha}{}^{\beta}$. Not sure what factor of 2 has been used in the definition of $\omega_{\mu\alpha}{}^{\beta}$ in terms of $\omega_{\mu a b}(\sigma^{ab})_\alpha{}^\beta$. Any suggestion how to check? $\endgroup$
    – vyali
    Commented Apr 13, 2023 at 3:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @vyali - answer edited! $\endgroup$
    – Prahar
    Commented Apr 13, 2023 at 11:23
  • $\begingroup$ I see, thank you. $\endgroup$
    – vyali
    Commented Apr 13, 2023 at 11:36
  • $\begingroup$ What is # supposed to be in the hint equation? $\endgroup$
    – vyali
    Commented Apr 15, 2023 at 14:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ that is again dependent on your conventions for $\sigma^{ab}$. If I remember correctly, the proper formula is $[ \nabla_\mu , \nabla_\nu ] \psi_\alpha = R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} e^\rho_c e^\sigma_d ( \Sigma^{cd} )_\alpha{}^{\beta} \psi_\beta$ where $\Sigma^{ab}$ is a (spinor) representation of the Lorentz algebra which is normalized to satisfy $[\Sigma_{ab} , \Sigma_{cd} ] = i ( \eta_{ac} \Sigma_{bd} - a \leftrightarrow b ) - c \leftrightarrow d$. Using the properties of $\sigma^{ab}$ you should be able to work out how this is related to the $\Sigma_{ab} = \# \sigma_{ab}$ $\endgroup$
    – Prahar
    Commented Apr 15, 2023 at 16:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.