This is clearly an obvious question but here is my issue.
Context :
We assume an axisymmetric deformation of a membrane, and work with cylindrical coordinates $(r; \phi; y)$. At time $t = 0$ we let $r$ and $\phi$ be the initial radial and circumferential location of a fabric point in the infinite, untensioned membrane lying at rest in the level ground plane $y = 0$. At time $t$ after impact, we let $u$ and $v$ be the in-plane and normal, out-of-plane components, respectively, of the displacement of this point, but its cylindrical angle $\phi$ remains the same. The new coordinates of the fabric point now become $(r +u; \phi; 0 + v)$
Visually it gives this :
Problem :
If we consider a membrane element initially of volume $dV_{0} = hr drd\phi$, where $h$ is its initial thickness and $\rho$ is its initial density then after the deformation the volume is written : $dV = h(r+u)(1+\epsilon_t)drd\phi$ with $\epsilon_t$ its local in-plane strain oriented radially. Then conservation of mass should be written : $\rho h r dr d\phi = \rho h (r+u)(1+\epsilon_t)drd\phi$
Question :
I understand this expression and the fact that the new "deformed" length is no longer $dr$ but $(1+\epsilon_t) dr$. However, I am trying to demonstrate it in a more formal way and to do that I wrote the displacement vector $\vec{u} = (u,0,v)$ in the cylindrical space and that's in order to obtain the expression of the tangent linear operator $F$ as $F = I + Grad(\vec{U})$ . Then, we know that there is a direct link between the variation of a volume element and the determinant of this tensor such as : $dV = J dV_0$ with $J = det(F)$. Using this : I am unable to recover the expression $(1+\epsilon_t)$ that appears in the expression presented before...
Am I doing something wrong ? I don't understand how I can't express this volume variation like suited.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Best regards.
P.S : The expression of $\epsilon_t$ is $\epsilon_t = \sqrt{(1 + \frac{\partial u}{\partial r})^2+(\frac{\partial v}{\partial r})^2} - 1$