0
$\begingroup$

Kaons are not eigenstates of $CP$: $$ CP|K\rangle =|\overline K\rangle\\ $$ Why do we need to mix them?

enter image description here

One answer I read is "since they both decay into $2$ or $3$ pions". Couldn't they just decay in the same thing and that's it? There are many other particles that happen to decay the same way, but we don't mix them.

*Addendum. Citing from "Mixing and Oscillations of Particles" by Andrzej K. Wroblewski:

In 1955 Murray Gell-Mann and Abraham Pais analyzed the behavior of neutral particles under the operation $C$ of charge conjugation which changes every particle into its anti-particle. According to the proposed scheme of classification of $K$ mesons, the neutral kaon $K^0$ was assumed to possess an anti-particle $\overline{K}^0$ distinct from itself. Gell-Mann and Pais were able to show that in that case the neutral kaon must be considered to be a “particle mixture”, exhibiting two distinct lifetimes and different decay modes.

What were the reasons that brought Gell-Mann and Pais to this conclusion?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why did you include those diagrams? You don't comment on them but it seems to me that they answer your question. $\endgroup$
    – octonion
    Jul 26, 2022 at 14:48
  • $\begingroup$ Strangeness oscillations is an experimental phenomenon. It was observed, so it was inferred that flavor mixing occurred; copiously for this system, but much more weakly for other systems. What is your point, really? What are you asking? Your read what where? $\endgroup$ Jul 26, 2022 at 15:01
  • $\begingroup$ I'm asking if $K$ oscillations were known before considering the possibility that they could violate $CP$ parity OR if these oscillations were introduced to justify the $CP$ violation $\endgroup$
    – ric.san
    Jul 26, 2022 at 15:13

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

It is a terrible misconception to predicate flavor mixing (strangeness oscillations here) on CP violation. Flavor mixing was investigated (Gell-Mann―Pais, 1955, and the experiments probing it, 1957, 1960) for a decade (1955-1964) before the discovery of CP violation in 1964 (Fitch―Cronin).

CP violation is just a minuscule twist on the flavor oscillation of neutral mesons like the weak diagrams you are displaying, and is not a precondition for it: just a minute phenomenon riding on phases attached to small CKM matrix elements in your box diagrams.

Edit to address the altered question decoupling from CP violation. The point of the Gell-Mann―Pais paper, was that the masses of the odd and even CP eigenstates, KL, KS, were slightly different, with vastly different lifetimes, exactly what you'd get from a strong Hamiltonian with small doubly weak off-diagonal mixing terms, upon diagonalization of the mass matrix.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.