1
$\begingroup$

In page 3 of PhysRevB.78.121101 they used an expression of electric quadrupole tensor as

$Q_{ij} = i \alpha_Q(k_i E_j + k_j E_i)$ or $\overleftrightarrow{Q}=i\alpha_Q(\vec{k}\vec{E}+\vec{E}\vec{k})$ , which is different from that derived from vector expansion in Jackson’s book $Q_{ij}=\int_V(3x'_ix'_j-r'^2\delta_{ij})\rho(x')dv'$ or $\overleftrightarrow{Q}=\int_V(3\vec{x}'\vec{x}'-r'^2\overleftrightarrow{I})dv'$. I am wondering how can I derive or understand this expression?

From formula (1.129) in Multipole Theory In Electromagnetism Classical, Quantum, And Symmetry Aspects, With Applications $\vec{D}=\epsilon_0\vec{E}+\vec{P}-\frac{1}{2}\nabla\cdot\overleftrightarrow{Q}$. At weak field approximation we have $\vec{P}=\chi \vec{E}$, I think the electric quadrupole polarizability $\alpha_Q$ can be defined like this. But I fail to prove or derive it.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

You can define the quadrupole interaction tensor in electrostatic situations as $\partial_i E_j=\partial_i\partial_j \phi$.In this case, the expression given in Jackson represents the (pure) quadrupolar component of $\phi$. The expression that you find in the paper is for an electromagnetic (plane) wave $E=E^0 exp(-ikr-i\omega t)$ If you calculate the symmetrized derivative $\partial_iE_j+\partial_jE_i$, you get $-i(k_iE_j+K_jE_i)$. So the two definitions are related to each other, but they don't describe the same object.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.