In alternating current (AC), electrons barely move a few centimeters along the conductor, with the usual frequencies and intensities in electric lines. That fact, together with Maxwell's equations, shows that it is actually impossible for it to be the kinetic energy of electrons that provides electrical energy to household appliances. In fact, it is the electromagnetic field surrounding the electrical wires that does carry energy. The Poynting vector calculation shows that there is a net flow from the electrical generator to the electrical devices that consume energy (additional details are discussed here and here).
But, in direct current (DC) once the stationary regime is reached, the electric and magnetic fields supposedly do not change, so the equation for the eletromagnetic energy density variation:
$$\frac{\partial \mathcal{E}_{EM}}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left(\varepsilon_0\mathbf{E}^2+\frac{\mathbf{B}^2}{\mu_0}\right) = -\mathbf{E}\cdot\mathbf{j} - \boldsymbol\nabla \cdot \left( \frac{\mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{B}}{\mu_0} \right)$$
If the electric and magnetic fields are constant then it seems that electromagnetic energy cannot "flow" and then we would have only that:
$$0 = -\mathbf{E}\cdot\mathbf{j} - \boldsymbol\nabla \cdot \left( \frac{\mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{B}}{\mu_0} \right)$$
and, therefore, the Poynting vector would be moving the charges. So it is not clear to me if it is correct to say that in DC the energy consumed by the electrical devices is indeed carried by the electrical charges.