4
$\begingroup$

The definition of the $S$-matrix is given by

$$S=\lim_{t_{f}\rightarrow\infty}\lim_{t_{i}\rightarrow-\infty}U(t_{f},t_{i}).$$

Where $U(t_{f},t_{i})$ is the evolution operator, given by the $$U(t_{f},t_{i})=Te^{-i\int_{t_{i}}^{t_{f}}V(\tau)d\tau},$$ which $V(t)$ is the interaction Hamiltonian, $T$ is the time-ordering.

One thing I do not quite understand is the reason for taking $t_{f},t_{i}$ to infinity. What is the purpose of that? The definition makes the integral $\int V(t)dt$ hard to converge due to the upper and lower limit being unbounded. Does there exists solid physical reasoning behind this?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ I think the main argument is that far away from collision point the observable integrals should always remain bounded, unless a long range interaction is on $\endgroup$
    – lurscher
    Commented May 26, 2022 at 13:12

1 Answer 1

8
$\begingroup$

As lurscher already said correctly, the idea is to choose an initial and a final time that is (in time) away from the actual time-dependent interaction in order to make sure that the interaction does not act at the initial and at the final time (well, this actually not completely true: the supposed free particles at $t_i$ and $t_f$ are not really free, in order to treat this correctly the concept of a dressed particle has to be introduced which under the effect of self-interaction has a different mass etc.. But this is out of scope here).

I would even say putting the initial and end time to infinite values makes the evaluation of the integral easier. Because in a further step one can construct Fourier integrals out of it which can be in the most cases evaluated --- and if not QFT disposes of a couple methods of regularization of integrals that will make the integral finite.

Example: QED in first order of perturbation theory: $V_I(t)\equiv H_I(t)$ represents the interaction part of the Hamiltonian. So the S-matrix is up to first order:

$$ S = id - i\int_{t_i\rightarrow-\infty}^{t_f\rightarrow\infty} \hat{H_I} dt$$

As long as there is no derivative in the expression the interaction Hamiltonian is just a volume integral over the negative of the interaction part of the Lagrange density.

$$ \hat{H_I} = -\int d^3x {\cal{L}} \quad$$

Now in QED the interaction operator is just the volume integral of the electron current $j^\mu$ and the electromagnetic 4-potential operator $\hat{A}_\mu$

$${\cal{L}} =-e\hat{j}^\mu \hat{A}_\mu$$

so plugging this into the precedent expression gives:

$$S = id - i \int_{t_i\rightarrow-\infty}^{t_f\rightarrow \infty} dt \int d^3x e \hat{j}^\mu \hat{A}_\mu = id - i \int d^4x e \hat{j}^\mu \hat{A}_\mu $$ In the last 4-dim. integral it is supposed that the integration borders in time and space are all put to $(\pm)$infinity.

Now we only need to plug in the electromagnetic potential operator into the last expression ($c$ and $c^\dagger$ are the annihilation and creation operators of photons):

The 4-potential operator can be developed in annihilation and creation operators:

$$\hat{A}_\mu = \sum_{\epsilon=1,2}\sum_p [c_{pe} \epsilon_\mu e^{-ipx} + c^\dagger_{pe} \epsilon^\ast_\mu e^{ipx} ]$$

$\epsilon_\mu$ are components of the polarisation vector of the photon.

Then we can compute S-matrix elements between an electron state $i$ and an electron state $f$ plus 1 photon like:

$$\langle 1_k f|S| 0i\rangle =\langle 1_k f| 0i\rangle - i \int d^4x e \langle f|j^\mu|i\rangle \sum_{\epsilon=1,2}\sum_p \langle 1_k| c^\dagger_{pe}| 0\rangle \epsilon^\ast_\mu e^{ipx} = - i\int d^4x \sum_{\epsilon=1,2} e \langle f|j^\mu(x)|i\rangle e^{ikx} \epsilon^\ast_\mu$$

where $\tilde{j}^\mu_{if}$ is the 4-dim. Fourier transform of the electromagnetic current:

$$\tilde{j}^\mu_{if}(k) = \int d^4x \langle f|j^\mu(x)| i\rangle e^{ikx}$$

Imagine the borders of the time integral were not infinite, the integral in time direction could not be (at least not easily) computed as it would not be a Fourier integral. For more details of the calculation see my post: Why is $\mathcal{M}(k)$ given by this? (Ward Identity derivation in Peskin & Schroeder)

EDIT

Using infinite integration border technique provides even more physics to uncover:

If the initial $\psi_i$ and end states $\psi_f$ in the current $j^\mu$ describe free particles we know that they behave like $\psi \sim e^{-ipx} \sim e^{-iEt} $

$$\langle f |j^\mu(x)| i \rangle = \bar{\psi}^f \gamma^\mu \psi_i \sim e^{iE_ft} e^{-iE_i t}$$

So:

$$\tilde{j}^\mu_{if}(k) = \int d^4x \langle f|j^\mu(x)| i\rangle e^{ikx} \sim \int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{iE_ft} e^{-iE_i t} e^{i\omega_\mathbf{k} t}dt \sim \delta(E_f -E_i +\omega_\mathbf{k})$$

You are right if $E_f = E_i + \omega_\mathbf{k}$ the integral diverges. But actually we found that the considered interaction fulfills energy conservation. These kind of delta functions appear systematically in the S-matrix, but disappear once the S-matrix element gets integrated over the phase space of the out-going particles. This delta-function appears also in simpler computations as for instance of transition probabilities via Fermi's golden rule. So using infinite integration borders provides us energy conservation.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.