5
$\begingroup$

In chapter 10 of Peskin & Schroeder the renormalization of the $\phi^4$ theory is discussed. The renormalization conditions are imposed such that the infinities are absorbed into the counter term variables, if I understand correctly. My question is, why does one use the specific renormalization conditions? I find in a later post why do the renormalization conditions related to the exact propagator exist (Understanding renormalization conditions in the $\phi^4-$theory), but it is not discussed much, neither in P&S, nor in the aforementioned post why do we have to impose the amputated 4 point diagram should be equal to $-i\lambda$ at $s=4m^2$ and $t=u=0$?

Any help would be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You can chose any renormalization condition you want. Whatever is most useful to your particular requirements. P&S is making a particular choice but nothing makes that choice special. $\endgroup$
    – Prahar
    Commented Feb 7, 2022 at 9:55
  • $\begingroup$ I realise that, but even when we have the freedom to choose any renormalization condition we want, we should have some sort of motivation, right?? Especially when imposing a renormalization condition for specific values of the s,t and u channels... $\endgroup$
    – schris38
    Commented Feb 7, 2022 at 10:43

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I think P&S explain their motivation in the book, if I'm not wrong (I haven't opened it in a long time!). I think the choice is motivated from an experimental POV. Suppose you were performing an $2\to2$ scattering experiment in the CM frame at energy $2E$. Then, $$s=4E^2, \qquad t=-4(E^2-m^2) \sin^2\frac{\theta}{2} , \qquad t=-4(E^2-m^2) \cos^2\frac{\theta}{2}. $$ To experimentally test out our theory, we first need to do a couple of "setup" experiments. Note that $\lambda$ and $m$ are parameters in our theory which must be fixed by experiment (i.e. the theory does not by itself predict these values). To fix these, we do one experiment at some energy scale $E_0$ which will fix $\lambda(E_0)$ and $m(E_0)$. Once this is known, the theory predicts the results of all other experiments at all energy scales. Every other experiment then can be used to test out the theory.

OK, now what's the best choice for $E_0$? Well, one natural choice is to measure it at the lowest possible energy scale, which in this case is $E_0=m$ (when $E<m$ there is no particle excitation so there is nothing to scatter). So, we perform the experiment at this scale and find $\lambda(m) = \lambda_0$ and $m(m) = m_0$. The renormalization condition chosen by P&S precisely defines the renormalized coupling and mass to these experimentally measured values.

Note that there are many other useful renormalization conditions. Sometimes, it is convenient to fix $\lambda$ in the unphysical regime of scattering (say when $t>0$). This choice makes the theoretical calculations easier, but then a few extra steps have to be taken to match anything to experiment.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.