1
$\begingroup$

I have already asked this question, but I forgot to include the if and only if. So the question has already been answered in one direction, but I have to prove the converse as well. So If $$e^{a\partial/ \partial\lambda +b \partial / \partial\mu}=e^{a\partial/ \partial\lambda}e^{b\partial/ \partial\mu}$$ then $$[\partial/ \partial\lambda,\partial/ \partial\mu]=0.$$ I thought of doing it by Taylor expanding all the three exponentials in the first equation and then bringing everything to one side. Then clearly the zeroth and first order terms cancel and the second order term yields the commutator. And so if one expands it up to second order one indeed gets that the commutator has to vanish. I guess that higher order terms will yield nested commutators. So for the first equation implies that the commutator has to vanish. But how can I show this in an elegant way for higher order terms as well?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand{\ex}[1]{\mathrm{e}^{#1}}$A quick way to see it is to add an auxiliary parameter, $s$ in the exponentials so that $$ \ex{s(a\, \partial_\lambda + b\,\partial_\mu)} = \ex{s\,a\, \partial_\lambda}\; \ex{s\, b\,\partial_\mu}.\tag{1}$$ Then you can Taylor expand both sides and take the second derivative with respect to $s$ evaluated at $s=0$, namely, since (1) holds, $$ \frac{\partial^2}{\partial s^2}\;\ex{s(a\, \partial_\lambda + b\,\partial_\mu)}\Bigg\vert_{s=0} = \frac{\partial^2}{\partial s^2}\;\ex{s\,a\, \partial_\lambda}\; \ex{s\, b\,\partial_\mu}\Bigg\vert_{s=0},$$ also holds. This keeps only the quadratic terms in the Taylor expansion, so you can prove $[\partial_\lambda, \partial_\mu]=0$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Shouldn't s be 1? $\endgroup$
    – eeqesri
    Commented Oct 17, 2021 at 16:43
  • $\begingroup$ Ok sorry. I think now I get it. But I don't quite see why this works. $\endgroup$
    – eeqesri
    Commented Oct 17, 2021 at 16:50
  • $\begingroup$ It works because the various terms in a power-series are linearly independent functions. The trick with the derivative is just the way to isolate a single term in the power-series. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 17, 2021 at 19:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.