0
$\begingroup$

I hear of a lot of people say that electron scattering is more useful than scattering with heavier particles like the $\alpha$ particle, but I'm not sure why this is the case. This is the first Born approximation for quantum mechanical scattering:

$$\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} = \left(\frac{m}{2\pi\hbar^2}\right)^2\left|\int e^{i\vec{q}\cdot \vec{r}}V(\vec{r})d^3{r}\right|^2$$

where $\sigma$ is the scattering cross section, $m$ is the mass of the incident particle, $\vec{q}$ is the change in momentum between incoming and outgoing particle states and $V(\vec{r})$ is the perturbing potential.

The only difference the electron would make in this formula as opposed to an $\alpha$ particle that I can see would be the lower mass factor out front, but this would actually lower the differential cross section significantly, and I don't see why that would be a good thing. There would also be a change in the factor infront of the potential function due to the smaller charge of the electron compared to the alpha particle, but this would not change the order of magnitude the same way the smaller electron mass would.

So what about an electron makes it so much more attractive for use than an $\alpha$ particle?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ 'a lot of people say' Could you be more specific, for example with a reference to a pear reviewed paper? $\endgroup$
    – my2cts
    Jun 7, 2021 at 9:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The transferred momentum, $\mathbf{q}$ is different : a light particle would experience greater deflection, hence higher resolution. $\endgroup$ Jun 7, 2021 at 9:28
  • $\begingroup$ If you are actually penetrating the nucleus (so not pure Coulombic Rutherford scattering), using an alpha particle is kind of like using a bowling ball to probe the structure of the pins at the end of the alley - better perhaps to use marbles if you don't want to knock down pins. $\endgroup$
    – Jon Custer
    Jun 7, 2021 at 13:16

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

The electron has much less mass than the alpha particle, which makes it easier to push its velocity up to the highest level possible. High velocities mean high energies and short wavelengths for the electron, and with an accelerator like SLAC it was possible to get an effective wavelength for the electron at the end of the beam line that was much much smaller than the measured diameter of a proton. This allowed the researchers to "look" at the insides of a proton.

In this picture, you can think of the SLAC as having been an electron microscope with a beam tube 10,000 feet long instead of 36 inches long.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.