0
$\begingroup$

There is the way of converting vector indices to spinor indices, for example, Maxwell stress tensor $F_{[\mu\nu]}$ can be decomposed to $(1,0) \oplus (0,1)$ irreducible representations of $\mathfrak{su}(2)_L\times \mathfrak{su}(2)_R$:

\begin{equation} F_{[\mu\nu]} \sim (\sigma_{[\mu\nu]})^{\alpha\beta} F_{(\alpha\beta)} + (\sigma_{[\mu\nu]})^{\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta}} F_{(\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta})} \end{equation}

Let's consider the Riemannian tensor $R_{[\mu\nu]\vert[\rho\sigma]}$:

\begin{equation} R_{[\mu\nu][\rho\sigma]} \sim (\sigma_{[\mu\nu]})^{\alpha\beta} (\sigma_{[\rho\sigma]})^{\gamma\delta} R_{(\alpha\beta)(\gamma\delta)} + (\sigma_{[\mu\nu]})^{\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta}} (\sigma_{[\rho\sigma]})^{\dot{\gamma}\dot{\delta}} R_{(\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta})(\dot{\gamma}\dot{\delta})} \end{equation}

But objects $R_{(\alpha\beta)(\gamma\delta)}$ and $R_{(\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta})(\dot{\gamma}\dot{\delta})}$ are reducible representations of $\mathfrak{su}(2)_L\times \mathfrak{su}(2)_R$. So we need decompose such objects further.

How do you decompose $R_{(\alpha\beta)(\gamma\delta)}$? What is meaning of the obtained objects ( objects like $W_{(\alpha\beta\gamma\delta)}$, $R_{(\alpha\beta)}$, $R$)?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ There are two books by Moshe Carmeli on this... $\endgroup$
    – DanielC
    May 10 at 17:11
  • $\begingroup$ @DanielC could you please provide concrete reference? $\endgroup$
    – Nikita
    May 10 at 17:28
  • $\begingroup$ Try M.Carmeli - „Group Theory and General Relativity”, Chapter 8. $\endgroup$
    – DanielC
    May 10 at 23:16
1
$\begingroup$

The most useful reference is ch. 13 of GR by Wald. But in book there are some mistakes in numerical coefficients.

Expansion of Rimannian thensor:

\begin{equation} R_{\alpha\dot{\alpha}\beta\dot{\beta}\gamma\dot{\gamma}\delta\dot{\delta}} = \Psi_{( \alpha\beta\gamma\delta)} \epsilon_{\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta}} \epsilon_{\dot{\gamma}\dot{\delta}} + \Phi_{(\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta})(\gamma\delta)} \epsilon_{\alpha\beta} \epsilon_{\dot{\gamma}\dot{\delta}} + \Lambda (\epsilon_{\alpha\gamma}\epsilon_{\beta\delta} + \epsilon_{\beta\gamma}\epsilon_{\alpha\delta}) \epsilon_{\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta}} \epsilon_{\dot{\gamma}\dot{\delta}} + c.c. \end{equation}

\begin{equation} 16 \, R_{abcd} = - \Psi_{( \alpha\beta\gamma\delta)} (\sigma_{ab})^{\alpha\beta} (\sigma_{cd})^{\gamma\delta} + \Phi_{(\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta})(\gamma\delta)} (\sigma_{ab})^{\alpha\beta} (\tilde{\sigma}_{cd})^{\dot{\gamma}\dot{\delta}} -4 \Lambda (\eta_{a d} \eta_{bc} - \eta_{ac} \eta_{bd} - i \epsilon_{abcd}) + c.c. \end{equation}

$$ 16 R = -4 \Lambda g^{ac}g^{bd} (\eta_{a d} \eta_{bc} - \eta_{ac} \eta_{bd}) = -4 \Lambda (4-16) = 48 \Lambda \;\;\; \Rightarrow \;\;\; \Lambda = \frac{R}{3} $$

\begin{equation} \sigma^{ab}_{\alpha\beta} \sigma^{cd}_{\gamma\delta} R_{abcd} = - \Psi_{( \alpha\beta\gamma\delta)} + 4 \Lambda \epsilon_{(\alpha\gamma} \epsilon_{\beta)\delta} + c.c. \end{equation}

$\endgroup$
14
  • $\begingroup$ You can also find a detailed derivation of this decomposition in "Spinors and Space-time", Volume-I , by Roger Penrose, Wolfgang Rindler. $\endgroup$
    – KP99
    Jul 3 at 10:24
  • $\begingroup$ Btw, isn't $\Lambda=R/24$ ? $\endgroup$
    – KP99
    Jul 3 at 10:25
  • $\begingroup$ @KP99 I edited answer. I don't know, how Penrose obtain $R/24$. Maybe he used nonstandart sigma-matrices. $\endgroup$
    – Nikita
    Jul 3 at 11:00
  • $\begingroup$ OK, I will redo that calculation, but since this is just a relation between scalars $\Lambda$ and R, I don't think it should depend on choice of sigma matrix. Also I found this same relation R/24 in other literatures. Anyway, let's see $\endgroup$
    – KP99
    Jul 3 at 11:55
  • $\begingroup$ Please check your calculation in the second line: You shouldn't get $16R_{abcd}=.....-4\Lambda(...)$, instead it should be $R_{abcd}=...-2\Lambda(...)$. For confirmation: see the tensor decomposition of $R_{abcd}$ in 4 dimension, it will have a term containing $R/12g_{abcd}$, but your calculation shows $R/3g_{abcd}$ $\endgroup$
    – KP99
    Jul 5 at 9:45
1
$\begingroup$

Calculation for Ricci scalar R in terms of $\Lambda$ (notations and identities borrowed from R.Penrose (1984)):

The Infeld - van der Waerden symbols are defined as: $${g_a}^{AA'}={g_a}^{\textbf{a}}{\epsilon_{\textbf{A}}}^{A}{\epsilon_{\textbf{A}'}}^{A'}$$ and it satisfies the following identities:

(1)$g_{ab}=\epsilon_{AB}\epsilon_{A'B'}{g_a}^{AA'}{g_b}^{BB'}$

(2i)${g_a}^{AA'}{g_{AA'}}^b={g_a}^b$ and (2ii) ${g_{AA'}}^a{g_a}^{BB'}={\epsilon_A}^B{\epsilon_{A'}}^{B'}$

(3)The "Clifford relation" :$2{{g_{(a|}}^A}_{A'}{g_{|b)B}}^{B'}=-{\epsilon_B}^Ag_{ab}$

And finally the transformation rule for spinor to spacetime indices given by: ${\chi_{a...c}}^{d...f}={\chi_{AA'...CC'}}^{DD'...FF'}{g_a}^{AA'}...{g_c}^{CC'}{g_{DD'}}^d...{g_{FF'}}^f$

Now refer to the relation (4.6.20) from the reference: $R_{ABA'B'}=6\Lambda\epsilon_{AB}\epsilon_{A'B'}-2\Phi_{ABA'B'}$ We have Ricci tensor given by $$R_{cd}=R_{(cd)}=R_{ABA'B'}{g_{(c}}^{AA'}{g_{d)}}^{BB'}$$ From relation (1) I can write $R_{ABA'B'}=6\Lambda g_{ab}{g_{AA'}}^a{g_{BB'}}^b-2\Phi_{ABA'B'}$, So

$R_{cd}=6\Lambda g_{ab}{g_{(c}}^{AA'}{g_{d)}}^{BB'}{g_{AA'}}^a{g_{BB'}}^b-2\Phi_{ABA'B'}{g_{(c}}^{AA'}{g_{d)}}^{BB'}$

By applying (2i) we get $R_{cd}=6\Lambda g_{ab}{g_{(c}}^a{g_{d)}}^b-2\Phi_{(cd)}=6\Lambda g_{cd}-2\Phi_{cd}$. Now contract with $g^{cd}$ on both sides. Since ${\Phi_a}^a=0$ we get $R=24\Lambda$

EDIT(1):Given the identity ${g^a}_{AA'}g^{bA'B}=g^{ab}{\delta_A}^B-i{{\sigma^{ab}}_A}^B $ verify that ${\sigma^{[ab]}}_{AB}=i{g^{[a}}_{AA'}{g^{b]A'}}_B$. Now $$R_{abcd}=R_{[ab][cd]}=R_{AA'BB'CC'DD'}{g_{[a}}^{AA'}{g_{b]}}^{BB'}{g_{[c}}^{CC'}{g_{d]}}^{DD'}$$ Expanding Riemann curvature spinor in terms of Weyl and Ricci Spinor and $\Lambda$ we will get the following expression: $$R_{abcd}=-\Psi_{ABCD}{\sigma_{[ab]}}^{AB}{\sigma_{[cd]}}^{CD}-\Phi_{ABC'D'}{\sigma_{[ab]}}^{AB}{\bar{\sigma}_{[cd]}}^{C'D'}+c.c.+2\Lambda (g_{ac}g_{bd}-g_{ad}g_{bc})$$ Note the anti-symmetrization in space-time indices in sigma matrix. If we focus on the $\Lambda$ part, we see that on contraction with $g^{bd}$ we get back the familiar $6\Lambda g_{ac}$ term as in (4.6.20)

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Where are mistakes in my answer? $\endgroup$
    – Nikita
    Jul 3 at 17:33
  • $\begingroup$ I think that there are differences in defenitions 1,2,3 $\endgroup$
    – Nikita
    Jul 3 at 17:35
  • $\begingroup$ @Nikita I just copied those expressions (1,2,3) from the textbook "Spinors and Space-time" Volume I. Can you re-send your calculation for R and $\Lambda$? The mistake isn't actually clear from your previous answer :( Ok , just tell what is the definition for sigma matrix you used in your calculation? I will compare those with Infeld van der Waerden symbols. That would help at least. $\endgroup$
    – KP99
    Jul 3 at 17:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.