0
$\begingroup$

The pseudo force equation is

$$\vec F_p=-2\,m\,(\vec \omega\times \vec v)-m\,(\vec\omega\times (\vec\omega\times \vec R))$$

where $~\vec v=\dot{\vec{R}}$ and $~\vec\omega=\text{const.}$

the pseudo force is depending on the generalized coordinates $~\vec q~$ and the generalized velocities $~\dot{\vec{q}}$

If we applied the Euler-Lagrange to obtain the equations of motion, the pseudo force is external force , but instead we can use potential energy with this Lagrange function

$$\mathcal{L}(~\vec q~,~\dot{\vec{q}})=\frac m2\,\vec{v}\cdot \vec{v}-U_p\\ U_p=m\,(\vec\omega\times\vec v)\cdot \vec R-\frac m2 (\vec\omega\times\vec R)\cdot (\vec\omega\times\vec R)$$

my question is what is the mathematical derivation to obtain the pseudo force potential $~U_p$?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What sort of derivation are you looking for, except the proof that this potential indeed reproduces the correct equations of motion as its E-L equations? We usually don't "derive" Lagrangians or Hamiltonians, really - their entire justification lies in reproducing the correct equations of motion $\endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    Commented Apr 22, 2021 at 17:16
  • $\begingroup$ @ACuriousMind how you obtain the equation of the potential energy ? $\endgroup$
    – Eli
    Commented Apr 22, 2021 at 17:20
  • $\begingroup$ Possible duplicates: Potential for a general fictitious force? $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Apr 22, 2021 at 18:30

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I don't think there is a general method to find $U_p$, but it must satisfy (using $x,y,z$ as generalized coordinates) $$\vec{F}_p=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\vec{\nabla}_{\vec{v}}U_p\right)-\vec\nabla U_p$$or, in components, $$\left(\vec{F_{p}}\right)_i=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial U_p}{\partial v_i}\right)-\frac{\partial U_p}{\partial x_i}.\tag{1}$$

You could try a solution in the form (repeated indices are summed from $1$ to $3$)$$U_p=A_{ijk}~\omega_i~v_j~x_k~+~B_{ijkl}~\omega_i~\omega_j~x_k~x_l~+...\tag{2}$$ where $x_i$ are the components of the vector $\vec{R}.$

Note that since the force does not depend on the acceleration, the generalized potential may depend at most linearly on the velocity. You can add terms to $(2)$ using arguments like this.

More notes:

  • The components of the force are (repeated indices are summed) $$\left(\vec{F_{p}}\right)_i=-2m~\epsilon_{ijk}~\omega_j~v_k-m~\epsilon_{ijk}~\omega_j~\epsilon_{kab}~\omega_a~x_b$$
  • By construction, $B_{ijkl}=B_{jikl}=B_{jilk}$.
$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ so you have to solve partial differential equations to obtain the solution for $U_p$ ? $\endgroup$
    – Eli
    Commented Apr 22, 2021 at 18:06
  • $\begingroup$ Well, that's an option, trying to solve $(1)$ for $U_p(\vec{R},\vec{v})$, but that may be very difficult. The option I recommend is trying a solution in the form of $(2)$, where $A_{ijk},B_{ijkl},...$ are constants, so you can introduce it into $(1)$ and algebraically find those constants. $\endgroup$
    – AFG
    Commented Apr 22, 2021 at 18:13
  • $\begingroup$ In general the position vector R is a function of the generalized coordinates in this case Eq (1) is not valid , you can’t say you have 3 components $\endgroup$
    – Eli
    Commented Apr 22, 2021 at 19:18
  • $\begingroup$ It is true that in general the generalized force is $$Q_i=\vec{F}\cdot\frac{\partial\vec{r}}{\partial q_i},$$ so the generalized potential must satisfy $$Q_i=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial \dot{q}_i}\right)-\frac{\partial U}{\partial q_i}.$$ I assumed that you were using $x,y,z$ as generalized coordinates, and in that case these two expressions reduce to the ones in my answer. $\endgroup$
    – AFG
    Commented Apr 22, 2021 at 20:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.