In a doped semiconductor, when considering the ionization of dopants, the density in the conduction band (for n-doping) is always quoted as $$n=\frac{N_D}{1+g\exp\left({\frac{E_D-\mu}{k_BT}}\right)}$$ where $N_D$ is the donor concentration, $E_D$ is the energy of the impurity state, and $g$ is its degeneracy. I cannot find any explanation for where the factor of $g$ comes from. I tried deriving it by saying the total number of carriers must equal the number in the conduction band plus the number bound to the impurities, so $$n+\frac{gN_D}{1+\exp\left({\frac{E_D-\mu}{k_BT}}\right)}=N_D,$$ but this doesn't work so something must be wrong.
-
$\begingroup$ researchgate.net/post/… has some info. So does tf.uni-kiel.de/matwis/amat/semi_en/kap_2/advanced/t2_2_2.html. $\endgroup$– Jon CusterCommented Mar 8, 2021 at 16:22
-
$\begingroup$ These sources just explain why there should be a degeneracy factor at all, but none of them explain why the $g$ appears where it does. $\endgroup$– GhorbalchovCommented Mar 8, 2021 at 16:55
1 Answer
Ashcroft and Mermin cover this in Chapter 28 (see Eqs. 28.30-32). I'll summarize.
The number of particles in a system at thermal equilibrium is
$$\left<n\right>=\frac{\sum{N_je^{-\beta\left(E_j-\mu N_j\right)}}}{\sum{e^{-\beta\left(E_j-\mu N_j\right)}}}$$
where the sum is over states. $E_j$ is the energy of a state, $N_j$ are the number of particles in the state, $\mu$ is the chemical potential, and $\beta = \frac{1}{k_B T}$. This is a common equation from statistical mechanics.
Say that our system is an impurity with one energy level $\epsilon_d$. We have four options: this level could be unoccupied, it could be occupied with a spin up electron, it could be occupied with a spin down electron, or it could be occupied with both a spin up and a spin down electron. In the cases we care about, the last option won't happen: there'd be coulomb repulsion between the two electrons, so the energy required would be too high compared to the temperature of our system. So, we ignore this last option.
In this case
$$\left<n\right>=\frac{0+e^{-\beta\left(\epsilon_d-\mu\right)} + e^{-\beta\left(\epsilon_d-\mu\right)}}{1+e^{-\beta\left(\epsilon_d-\mu\right)}+e^{-\beta\left(\epsilon_d-\mu\right)}} = \frac{2e^{-\beta\left(\epsilon_d-\mu\right)}}{1+2e^{-\beta\left(\epsilon_d-\mu\right)}} = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{2}e^{\beta\left(\epsilon_d-\mu\right)}+1}$$
Then, if you have a donor concentration of $N_d$, just multiply in that concentration:
$$n_d=\frac{N_d}{\frac{1}{2}e^{\beta\left(\epsilon_d-\mu\right)}+1}$$
The $g$ in this case is $\frac{1}{2}$