It is claimed by Wikipedia that:

Nocturnal ice making in early India and Iran

In India before the invention of artificial refrigeration technology, ice making by nocturnal cooling was common. The apparatus consisted of a shallow ceramic tray with a thin layer of water, placed outdoors with a clear exposure to the night sky. The bottom and sides were insulated with a thick layer of hay. On a clear night the water would lose heat by radiation upwards. Provided the air was calm and not too far above freezing, heat gain from the surrounding air by convection was low enough to allow the water to freeze. A similar technique was used in Iran.

So the set up would something like this:

Nocturnal ice

Where both $T_a$ and $T_w$ are close to $0^{\circ}\mathrm{C}$ but $T_a > T_w$.

We're then lead to believe that due to radiative losses the water will freeze (turn to ice).

In another version (with the same set up) it is claimed the mechanism for cooling and subsequent freezing is evaporative cooling of the water.

This too I find somewhat incredible because $T_a>T_w$.

So is this method of freezing water effectively possible and if so, by what mechanism?

  • $\begingroup$ Your question recalled this thread: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/121299/… - I suppose if the "temperature of the sky" is below zero and the radiative efficiency exceeds the efficiency of heating from the air, and night is long enough, it should work... But this is the first I've heard of it. $\endgroup$ Feb 13, 2021 at 20:16
  • $\begingroup$ @KristofferSjöö It smacks too much of 'hocus pocus' to me... $\endgroup$
    – Gert
    Feb 13, 2021 at 20:42
  • $\begingroup$ @Gert - easy enough to try it on a cold (but not freezing) night. Use a thermos bottle at outdoor temperature, put a little water at the bottom, and leave pointing up at the night sky. (Answer: it does work.) $\endgroup$
    – Jon Custer
    Mar 26, 2021 at 14:05
  • $\begingroup$ See also: Nocturnal freezing of water: Calculation of radiation through atmosphere? $\endgroup$
    – puzzlet
    Oct 21, 2023 at 13:36

2 Answers 2


Absolutely. On a clear, windless, dry night, get one of those IR thermometers and point it up at the sky. Temperatures below -40C can be seen in lots of places if it's dry enough. The less water vapor in the air, the cooler it can appear.

The thermal environment for the water is:

  • conduction with the tray (chosen for low conductivity)
  • conduction with the air (low conductivity)
  • convection with the air (very low on a still evening with the water cooler than the air)
  • radiation above the water (40 degrees cooler not uncommon)

Together, these allow the water to equilibrate at a temperature below freezing, even if the air is above freezing. Radiative transfer at these temperatures isn't very fast, so it will take a few hours.

  • $\begingroup$ I would add a fifth: latent heat due to evaporation. $\endgroup$
    – Ben51
    Feb 14, 2021 at 13:36

Possible but requires very specific circumstances.

Suppose we put the same bowl of water on the outside of a space satellite orbiting in the thermosphere and position huge mirrors in nearby orbit to block the radiation of the sun. The near-vacuum atmosphere there is at temperatures above 2000 K (1). The water will never equilibrate to 2000K. The thermosphere will always be heating the bowl and the bowl will always be cooling the thermosphere, but because the density of the bowl is millions of times higher, it will lose heat by radiation far faster than it gains heat by thermal contact. The bowl will eventually equilibrate to a tiny fraction of a Kelvin above the radiation temperature of the surrounding space, about 200K if the bowl is illuminated by Earth's thermal radiation, or about 3K if it has to make do with the radiation of the distant stars.

So radiative cooling can, under the correct circumstances, allow water to freeze. Can those circumstances exist on Earth? Yes, for air temperatures very close to freezing, and for very still air and very good insulation slightly above freezing, since air's thermal conductivity is very low.

In the limit as $T_{W_i} \to T_{A_i}$, $dQ_{thermal} \to 0$ (assuming negligible contribution from the ground through the insulation.

$$\frac {dQ_{radiation}}{dt} \approx σεA(T_W^4 -T_{atm}^4) $$ where σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, A is the surface area exposed to the sky, and $T_W$ is its temperature in kelvin, and $T_{atm}$ is the ambient temperature due to radiation of the night sky at Earth's surface. ε is the emissivity of the surface, a unitless number between 0 (a mirror) and 1 (a perfectly black surface). Water is about 0.96, depending on the wavelength under consideration.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/153947/285671 has a discussion of how to approximate the temperature of the night sky from below.

Approximate $T_W = 273.3K \pm (T_{W_i}-273.3K)$ and retain error instead of making the calculus complicated, since our calculation isn't going to have more than two significant figures anyway.

Integrate over, say, six hours from the last haze of sunlight in the west to the first predawn glow in the east to get $Q \leq \Delta t \frac {dQ}{dt}$. (It's less because the emissivity of the water will fall as it begins to freeze.) Reduce Q by $4.2\frac {J}{gK}$ until you reach 273.3K and then divide what's left by 333.55 J/g and your answer is in grams of ice.

1: Direct impacts of solar rays with air molecules (esp. oxygen) allows the temperature (that is to say average kinetic energy of the molecules) to far exceed the effective radiation temperature of the sun at earth's distance, some 393 K.

Regarding evaporative cooling, that won't contribute much to freezing, but it will absolutely cool the water below the ambient air temperature. You can do this experiment yourself. Get a water bottle at room temperature. Put a few thick socks on it. Soak the socks in more room temperature water. Suspend the bottle in your shower and wait an hour. Measure the temperature of the water in the bottle. You won't find any ice in the water, but it will be colder than the air temperature. The effect will be more noticeable the hotter and drier the air.

edit 2/13/21 - replaced guess of sky radiation temperature with link to a formula for predicting it

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for that answer: full of useful info. $\endgroup$
    – Gert
    Feb 14, 2021 at 2:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.