2
$\begingroup$

The relativistic form of the radial momentum equation for spherical fluid flow is $$\gamma_v^2v\frac{dv}{dr}+\frac{1}{\rho}\frac{dp}{dr}+\frac{d\Phi}{dr}=0$$ where $\gamma_v=\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}$ is the Lorentz factor and $\Phi$ is the gravitational potential.

The specific enthalpy of the flow is expressed as $h=u+\dfrac{P}{\rho}$, where $u$ is the specific energy. Using the first law of thermodynamics, we obtain $dh=Tds+\dfrac{dp}{\rho}$, so that $ds=\dfrac{dp}{\rho}$ for an isentropic flow. Thus, the above equation reduces to $$\boxed{\gamma_v^2v\frac{dv}{dr}+\frac{dh}{dr}+\frac{d\Phi}{dr}=0}$$

CASE 1:

In the non-relativistic limit, $v\ll1$, and this means $\gamma_v=1$, and the radial momentum equation reduces to $$v\frac{dv}{dr}+\frac{dh}{dr}+\frac{d\Phi}{dr}=0$$ Integrating this equation one obtains the Bernoulli function $$\mathscr{B}=\frac{v^2}{2}+h+\Phi\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\quad(1)$$

CASE 2:

To obtain the Bernoulli function for relativistic flow, we need to retain the Lorentz factor, so that the radial momentum equation is $$\frac{v}{1-v^2}\frac{dv}{dr}+\frac{dh}{dr}+\frac{d\Phi}{dr}=0$$ Thus, the Bernoulli function can be obtained as $$\mathscr{B}=\ln\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}\right)+h+\Phi\qquad\qquad\qquad(2)$$

Question:

The non-relativistic Bernoulli function (eqn.$1$) is a well-known expression found in most textbooks, but I am not sure whether the relativistic Bernoulli function (eqn.$2$) that I had derived is correct or not. Am I doing the correct calculations? If not, can someone suggest the correct approach?

$\endgroup$
1

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

I thnk you can compare your work with this page. It's chock-full of rendered equations, ending with this conclusion:

where $v$ is the flow velocity and the Lorentz factor $\gamma$ is given by

$$\gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$$

The time component of eq. $(9.6)$ is implied by the other three. In the case of isentropic flow, that is, when $\sigma/n=const.$, and assuming the flow to be steady, the spatial components of eq. $(9.6)$ give

$$\gamma(v\cdot grad)(\gamma\omega v/n)+c^2grad(\omega/n)=0$$

Scalar multiplication by $v$ leads to

$$(v\cdot grad)(\gamma\omega/n)=0$$

which implies that along any streamline the quantity

$$\gamma\omega/n=const.$$

This is the relativistic version of Bernoulli's equation.

Another, somewhat longer and deeper analysis can be found here.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Props to @Jonas for re-coding the equations from the original jpg $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 25, 2021 at 16:39
0
$\begingroup$

Your expression for the lorentz factor is wrong: $$\gamma_v=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}\neq\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}.$$ The non relativistic case is $v\ll c$ and not $v \ll 1$. This makes your second approach equivalent to your first, which leads to the correct answer.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Sorry! I forgot to mention in the question that I have chosen geometrized units $G=M=c=1$. $\endgroup$
    – Richard
    Commented Jan 25, 2021 at 22:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.