2
$\begingroup$

I'm assuming objects don't move all the time because they emit IR radiation in all directions. If we have an IR mirror behind the object to focus their direction, would this propel the object forward?

$\endgroup$

3 Answers 3

3
$\begingroup$

Yes, this would work, but the amount of thrust created would be pitifully small. For example, a sphere of radius 1 cm at 300 K radiates

$$\sigma T^4 \cdot A = \left(5.67 \times 10^{-8} \,\mathrm{W \cdot m^{-2} \cdot K^{-4}}\right) \cdot \left(300 \,\mathrm{K}\right)^4 \cdot \left(4\pi (1 \,\mathrm{cm})^2\right) = 0.577 \,\mathrm{W}$$

where $\sigma$ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant, $T$ is the temperature, and $A$ is the surface area. This is enough power to produce a thrust of $(0.577 \,\mathrm{W}) / c = 1.93 \times 10^{-8} \,\mathrm{N}$. That's a measurable effect, but it's not very impressive.

Still, even a very small amount of thrust, applied consistently over a long period of time, can eventually make an object go pretty fast. What would it take to turn this device into a viable rocket engine? Well, you'd need to increase the temperature a lot and add a powerful, long-lasting heat source. That prompts the idea of the nuclear photonic rocket – essentially, a very hot nuclear reactor propelled by black body radiation. Some people think this could be an (at least somewhat) plausible idea for space flight outside of the solar system.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure I agree: if the "mirror" is behind the object and connected to it, wouldn't the forces cancel out? Isn't this the same as the fan and sail example, though with radiation instead of wind? $\endgroup$
    – Philip
    Commented Nov 28, 2020 at 7:13
  • $\begingroup$ @Philip In the video you linked, the sail failed because it was poorly constructed and did not reflect the wind from the fan efficiently. With better design, it's possible to produce net thrust with a fan and sail (for example, see this video). In general, though, reflecting radiation using a mirror works much better than reflecting wind using a sail, because wind tends to lose energy while circling around to flow in the opposite direction. $\endgroup$
    – Thorondor
    Commented Nov 28, 2020 at 7:35
  • $\begingroup$ Hmm, I don't think "poorly constructed" is the right description, but I get your point, the shape of the sail would certainly matter. $\endgroup$
    – Philip
    Commented Nov 28, 2020 at 7:51
  • $\begingroup$ @Philip yes the mirror must be moved to follow the emitter. $\endgroup$
    – Alchimista
    Commented Nov 28, 2020 at 10:41
1
$\begingroup$

Your mirror idea will work, as it says in the answer by Thorondor, but the amount of force is very small. Indeed this is reminiscent of the way an ordinary rocket motor works. In the rocket case the motor emits matter as well as light, and there is a 'mirror' (i.e. the wall of chamber) at the back of the motor so that the hot matter is all ejected in one direction, thus resulting in thrust (momentum transfer to the body of the rocket). If the materials could withstand the temperatures, then at high enough temperature you could get a substantial contribution from the momentum of the electromagnetic radiation. It would be thermal radiation, but not in the infra-red part of the spectrum because the temperatures are so high. It would have to be gamma rays.

Here is a related and well known phenomenon. If you take an ordinary object, say metallic or ceramic, and make one side of it rough and black, and the other side smooth and silver, then the thermal radiation will be emitted more by the black side than the silver side, resulting in a small net radiation pressure force. In outer space (i.e. in vacuum) this would be enough to cause a little acceleration. As long as it is hot enough, the object will accelerate in the direction of the silvered side (the side with reduced emission).

You can buy a small device called Crookes radiometer intended to demonstrate this phenomenon with vanes rotating in an evacuated glass bulb, but be warned: the devices on the market almost never get a good enough vacuum to make the radiation pressure effect the main contribution. In an imperfect vacuum there is a further effect from gas molecules colliding with the vanes. In this case the device still functions as a radiometer (a way of measuring electromagnetic radiation) but it would not be a demonstrator of radiation pressure.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

No, it would not work. The mirror reflects thermal radiation in the direction of the object and this gives radiation pressure. However it intercepts the radiation that would otherwise come through its location so nothing changes. This assumes that the object is in equilibrium with an isothermal environment so there will be isotropic thermal radiation. If this assumption is not met the object will accelerate due to anisotropic irradiation and emission even without a mirror. In such cases a mirror will have an impact.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.