0
$\begingroup$

The following infinitesimal transformation of phase space coordinates (for infinitesimal $\epsilon$) is apparently canonical (preserving Hamilton's equations and Poisson brackets):

$$ q_i' = q_i + \epsilon \frac{\partial g}{\partial p_i} $$

$$ p_i' = p_i - \epsilon \frac{\partial g}{\partial q_i} $$

where $g$ is the generator and a function of $q$ and $p$.

When computing the conditions for being canonical in terms of Poisson Brackets $\{q_i', q_j'\} = 0$, $\{p_i', p_j'\} = 0$, $\{q_i', p_j'\} = \delta_{ij}$. There seems to be second-order partial derivative terms that don't cancel. For example,

$$\{q_i', q_j'\} = \Sigma_k (\frac{\partial q_i'}{\partial q_k} \frac{\partial q_j'}{\partial p_k} - \frac{\partial q_i'}{\partial p_k} \frac{\partial q_j'}{\partial q_k}) = [(1 + \epsilon \frac{\partial ^2 g}{\partial q_i \partial p_i})(\epsilon \frac{\partial ^2 g}{\partial p_i \partial p_j}) - (\epsilon \frac{\partial ^2 g}{(\partial p_i)^2})(\epsilon \frac{\partial ^2 g}{\partial q_i \partial p_j})] + [(\epsilon \frac{\partial ^2 g}{\partial p_i \partial q_j}) (\epsilon \frac{\partial ^2 g}{(\partial p_j)^2}) - (\epsilon \frac{\partial ^2 g}{\partial p_j \partial p_i})(1 + \epsilon \frac{\partial ^2 g}{\partial q_j \partial p_j})] + \Sigma_{k \neq i,j} (\frac{\partial q_i'}{\partial q_k} \frac{\partial q_j'}{\partial p_k} - \frac{\partial q_i'}{\partial p_k} \frac{\partial q_j'}{\partial q_k}).$$

It doesn't look like these first sets of terms for $i$ and $j$ cancel and neither do the sum of the terms not with respect to $i$, or $j$. I see a similar issue with the other Poisson Brackets. Are these second-order partial derivatives all 0? I'm not sure what I am missing. If possible, any hints would be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ $\epsilon^2$ is second order, so you can drop those terms $\endgroup$ – Wolphram jonny Nov 23 '20 at 0:16
  • $\begingroup$ ohhh ok. Please feel free to post that as an answer. $\endgroup$ – dylan7 Nov 23 '20 at 1:14
1
$\begingroup$

As @WolphrameJonny said, As we are doing infinitesimal changes, We can neglect all the term which are of the higher order (greater that $1$) in $\epsilon$. So if
$$Q_j=q_j+\epsilon\frac{\partial G}{\partial p_j}+O(\epsilon^2)=q_j+\epsilon\frac{\partial G}{\partial p_j}$$ You may also be interested in the following related physics.SE posts:

Neglecting second order differentials

Rigorous underpinnings of infinitesimals in physics

Commutator of Lorentz boost generators : visual interpretation

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.