1
$\begingroup$

So I’m doing QM and found bunch of problems for beginners and I’m struggling with this one: $$\lim_{a\rightarrow 0}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}e^{\frac{ip x}{\hbar}-a x^2}dx=2\pi\hbar\delta(p).$$ If I swap the limit and the integral I get the correct answer, but can I do that?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Compete the square in the exponent and do the Gaussian integral. Don't swap. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 6, 2020 at 0:00
  • $\begingroup$ related question on math stack exchange: math.stackexchange.com/q/253696 $\endgroup$
    – Andrew
    Commented Oct 6, 2020 at 0:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Would Mathematics be a better home for this question? $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Oct 6, 2020 at 5:15
  • $\begingroup$ I believe the OP could provide more context to this question. This is a more general problem of Fourier Transform of a Gaussian state. The physics is interesting, may be add more context to be useful to a larger audience? $\endgroup$
    – Fracton
    Commented Oct 6, 2020 at 5:45

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

Using $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-\alpha x^2+\beta x}=\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{\alpha}}\exp{\frac{\beta^2}{4\alpha}}$
put $n=1/a$ we get

$\lim_{n \to \infty}\sqrt{\pi n \cdot\frac {\pi 4 \hbar^2}{\pi 4 \hbar^2}}\exp{\frac{-p^2n}{4\hbar^2}}$ Now define $n=>n/4\hbar^2$

Now,$e^{-nx^2}\sqrt{\frac{n}{\pi}}$ defines a generalised function $\delta(x)$ such that

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\delta(x)F(x)=F(o)$ in limit $n\rightarrow\infty$ can be easily proved (ref.M.J.Lighthill Fourier and Generalised Functions for more)

We get your answer $2\pi\hbar\delta(p)$

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

You can just rewrite the integral first(make substitutions $x = -x$, $\frac{p}{\hbar}=k$), say $$I=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx \ e^{-i k.x} e^{-ax^2}$$ Now, this is a like a Fourier transform of a Gaussian function.

Where $$I = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{a}}e^{-\frac{k^2}{4a}}$$

Therefore, you can look at the definitions of dirac delta as limit, and write $$ 2\pi \ \lim_{a\rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{2\sqrt{{\pi a}}}e^{\frac{-k^2}{4a}} = 2\pi \delta(k) $$ Now, using the property of dirac delta $\delta(ax) = \frac{1}{|a|}\delta(x)$, you can get to your final form.

PS: But, it would be interesting to think of the physical motivation of this manipulation for the context in which OP might be looking at this question.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.