2
$\begingroup$

In Nielsen and Chuang we define the partial trace operator, defined as

$$\operatorname{tr}_2(|a_1\rangle\langle a_2| \otimes |b_1\rangle\langle b_2|) = |a_1\rangle\langle a_2| \operatorname{tr}(|b_1\rangle\langle b_2|)$$

They go on to say that $\operatorname{tr}_2(|11\rangle\langle00|) = |1\rangle\langle0|\langle0|1\rangle$, which presumably means that $|11\rangle\langle00| = |1\rangle\langle0|\otimes|1\rangle\langle0|$, but how did we arrive at this? Can a similar expression be derived for multi-qubit states?

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

This is just notation. We write $\vert 1\rangle\langle 0\vert \otimes \vert 1\rangle\langle 0\vert$ as $\vert 11\rangle\langle 00\vert$.

It generalizes exactly as you would expect for multiple qubits e.g. $\vert 000\rangle = \vert 0\rangle\otimes\vert 0\rangle\otimes\vert 0\rangle$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What's the benefit of using that notation? Is it purely for brevity, or does it allow for neat manipulations (like how the notation $\langle a || b \rangle = \langle a | b \rangle $ always indicates an inner product? $\endgroup$
    – actinidia
    Commented Oct 5, 2020 at 20:45
  • $\begingroup$ Purely brevity, in my opinion. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 5, 2020 at 20:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.