Let's think about the following quantities:
- Kinetic energy: $K=\frac{1}{2}mv^2$
- Lorentz's Force: $\vec{F}=q\vec{E}+q\vec{v} \times \vec{B}$
This two quantities are not invariant under Galilean transformation. I have a couple of questions:
Question one: In classical mechanics how do we deal with the fact that the energy of an object is frame dependent? Do we simply state that it is what it is and move on? Is it not important that this fundamental quantity is frame dependent because this is a quantity and not a law?
Question two: For the second quantity: assume constant magnetic field in the region of space in which the charge is moving, assume also to use Galilean transformation; it's obvious that different observers will see the charge moving with different velocities. But what if we use the relative velocity with respect to the magnetic field to calculate the force? (Immagine to have a large electromagnet that generates a constant magnetic field in a region of space and to consider the relative velocity with respect to it) If we do this everyone should get the same exact result for the force $\vec{F}$. If we do this then the Lorentz force $F$ will be invariant under Galilean Transformation. Why is this incorrect? I mean: In the formula for the Lorentz Force why do we use the absolute velocity and not the relative velocity with respect to the magnetic field? (or if you don't like to say "with respect to the magnetic field" then say: with respect to the generator of the magnetic field, e.g. electromagnet)