1
$\begingroup$

What's the difference between locally Lorentzian and locally euclidean? Was the former (Lorentzian) the hyperbolic surface restriction of the latter (Euclidean)?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Is this from a reference? Which page? $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    May 20 '20 at 18:39
  • $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic I'm reading Gravitation chapter 13 the metric, where the concept of local Lorentz came up and a simple (necessary but not sufficient) criterion. I got curious, and started thinking, I mean, could the geometry resolve one of the sign change in the euclidean norm by itself? $\endgroup$ May 20 '20 at 18:49
  • $\begingroup$ @Qmechanic The concept first came up at track 1 page 20 box 1.3. $\endgroup$ May 20 '20 at 19:01
4
$\begingroup$

A pseudo-Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ is locally Euclidean (Lorentzian) if the metric tensor $g$ has positive (Minkowski) signature, respectively.

NB: Concerning the use of the word Euclidean, see also my Phys.SE answer here.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.