Suppose a particle, say a positron is moving with initial velocity ${\bf v} = (c/3,c/3,c/3)$, where $c$ is the speed of light. Then the relativistic momentum is ${\bf p} = \gamma m{\bf v}$. Now suppose we apply a force, perhaps due to an electric field E $=(0,0,E)$, so the force is F$= (0,0,eE)$.
In Newtonian mechanics this force can only change the z component the momentum and the x and y components are conserved as no force acts in their direction.
In the relativistic case I don't understand how the components of the momentum will change as they cannot be independent of each other.
Here is my frame of thought.
An increase in the $z$ component of the velocity will increase the $\gamma$ factor. But if the momentum in the $x$ and $y$ direction is conserved then the $x$ and $y$ components of the velocity must decrease to compensate for an increasing $\gamma$ factor.
Is this reasoning the physical reality?
-
$\begingroup$ why does relativity make the components of momentum dependent? $\endgroup$– JEBCommented May 15, 2020 at 18:07
-
$\begingroup$ never mind, I get it. It's a good question. $\endgroup$– JEBCommented May 15, 2020 at 18:56
1 Answer
Note that 4-velocity can be written:
$$ u^{\mu} =\gamma c (1, \vec{\beta}) $$
so you can read off $\gamma$ and the 3-velocity as long as there is a "1" in time-slot (that is, $\gamma c$ is factored out).
So you have
$$ u^{\mu} = c\sqrt{\frac 3 2}(1, \frac 1 3, \frac 1 3, \frac 1 3) $$
and
$$F^{\mu\nu}=\frac E c\left(\begin{array}{cccc}0&0&0&-1\\0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&0\\1&0&0&0\end{array}\right) $$
The Lorentz force law says:
$$ m\frac{du^{\mu}}{d\tau}=\frac{dp^{\mu}}{d\tau}=qF^{\mu\nu}u_{\nu}$$
$$ a^{\mu}\equiv\frac{du^{\mu}}{d\tau} = \frac{eE}m\sqrt{\frac 1 6}(1, 0, 0, 3)$$
First, note that 4-acceleration is orthogonal to 4-velocity (which is always the case for every force and every particle):
$$ a^{\mu}u_{\mu}=[\frac{eE}m\sqrt{\frac 1 6}(1,0,0,3)][\sqrt{\frac 1 6} c\gamma(3,-1,-1,-1)]=0$$
so that $||u^{\mu}|| = c$ and this $||p^{\mu}|| = mc^2$ after the acceleration (as it must).
Moreover, the transverse component of the 4-velocity and momentum don't change:
$$\frac{d u_1}{d\tau} = \frac{d u_2}{d\tau}=0$$
$$\frac{d p_1}{d\tau} = \frac{d p_2}{d\tau}=0$$
But....
$$u_i = \gamma v_i, \ \ i\in(1,2)$$
and if $\gamma$ changes, the $v_i$ must change.
Let's look at a small change in 4-velocity:
$$ u^{\mu} \rightarrow u'^{\mu} = u^{\mu} + a^{\mu} \delta\tau $$
Then:
$$u'^{\mu} = c\sqrt{\frac 3 2}(1+x, \frac 1 3, \frac 1 3, \frac 1 3+3x)$$
where $ x = (\delta\tau)\frac{eE}{cm}\frac 1{\sqrt 6}\sqrt{\frac 2 3}$.
Doing some rearranging:
$$u'^{\mu} = c\sqrt{\frac 3 2}(1+x)(1, \frac 1 {3(1+x)}, \frac 1 {3(1+x)}, (\frac 1 3+3x)/(1+x))$$
What we see here is that:
$$ \gamma \rightarrow \gamma \cdot (1+x) $$
and the transverse components of 3 velocity:
$$ v_i \rightarrow v_i / (1+x), \ \ \ i\in (1,2)$$
which shows exactly what the OP suspected: the change in Lorentz factor accounts for a change in transverse 3 velocity while conserving transverse momentum.
-
$\begingroup$ Excellent answer, +1. I don’t think this needs to be in the answer but thought it would be worth stating here that for extended bodies or systems of particles it is possible to have a four acceleration which is not orthogonal to the four velocity. In that case the force changes the mass of the object. For example a force that compresses a spring. Your answer is correct since you explicitly state “particle” which implies that the mass is fixed $\endgroup$– DaleCommented May 15, 2020 at 20:19
-
$\begingroup$ that's interesting...I said it keeps "m" on shell...but if m changes, then it has to be violated. Moreover: given that any uniformly accelerated object must experience internal stress (Bell's Spaceship Paradox)....idk, could be a could problem there. $\endgroup$– JEBCommented May 16, 2020 at 0:08