2
$\begingroup$

I'm reading through Xiao-Gang Wen's Quantum Field Theory of Many-body Systems, and I just begin reading $Z_2$ lattice gauge theory.

In page 255, the author constructed a four-fold denegerate (in the sense that they give rise to the same $Z_2$ flux $F_i$) link variable configuration with the statement that they are not gauge invariant. $$ s_{ij}^{(m,n)}=f_x^m(i,j)f_y^n(i,j)s^0_{ij}. $$

To prove the statement, the author leaved a hint (consider $U(C)=s_{ij}s_{jk}\dots s_{li}$ with $C$ going around the torus) and referred to some physical picture in Chapter 9.

Referring to Chapter 9 (page 394,395), I grasped some idea that sarting from $i$, going along $x$ direction and back to $i$, we will get a phase $e^{i\pi m}$ ($e^{i\pi n}$ for $y$ direction).

Since I just started reading Chapter 6, I can't understand some fancy words in Chapter 9, thus still not knowing what's the meaning of "the four-fold degenerate configuration are not globally gauge equivalent".

Is there anyone who has read this book willing to give me some clear picture about this statement?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

The statement "the four-fold degenerate configuration are not globally gauge equivalent" means that these four configurations belong to four different equivalence classes. To begin with, we know that the operator $$ U(C)=s_{i j} s_{j k} \cdots s_{l i} $$ is gauge invariant (under $\mathbb{Z}_2$ gauge $\tilde{s}_{i j}=W_i s_{i j} W_j^{-1}$ ). But if we chose C to be a topological untrivial loop on the torus, that is "going around the torus" as you mentioned, we will find that the operator $U(C)$ is different under different configuration (chosing different m and n). That means these four configurations are not equivalent under gauge transformation, belong to four different equivalence classes.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.