2
$\begingroup$

The lagrangian of the Real Scalar Field $\phi$ is given by

\begin{equation} \mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2}\eta^{\mu \nu} \partial _\mu \phi \partial _{\nu} \phi - \frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi^2 \end{equation} \begin{equation} \eta^{\mu \nu} = diag(+1,-1,-1,-1) \end{equation} But what is the real motivation behind this equation?

I've read in several books this equation. In some books it is "defined", in others is given a completely unsatisfactory derivation for this equation , like "let's make an analogy with a coupled oscillators system". I've understood that the natural units makes the Lagrangian have dimension of $[mass]^4$ and the fact that the Lagrangian must be a Lorentz Invariant so the derivatives of the field must be $\partial _\mu \phi$, but how can i get the "1/2" coefficient in this Lagrangian and where does come from this "$m^2 \phi^2$? The "$m$" coefficient is the mass of the field or its just a constant with dimension of mass? Please help with this issue.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What is the motivation behind any lagrangian? $\endgroup$ – Dvij Mankad Jan 10 at 0:56
1
$\begingroup$

As you say, when building a Lagrangian for a theory, we almost always wish it to be a Lorentz scalar. Obviously, we can take any power of the scalar field, $\phi$, that is, we can have terms of the form,

$$\mathcal L = \dots + \sum_{n\geq 0} c_n \phi^n + \dots$$

with coefficients of our choosing. This means we could consider a term like $\sin \phi$ since upon Taylor expansion, at least at the level of the Lagrangian, it amounts to simply adding an infinite number of $\phi^n$ terms (this results in Sine-Gordon theory, incidentally).

We can also consider derivatives of the field $\partial_\mu \phi$ and indeed combining two of them, we can produce the scalar $\partial^\mu \phi \partial_\mu \phi$. A Lagrangian with just this term gives us the wave equation, $\square \phi = 0$, which as you should be aware is fundamental and ubiquitous in physics. This alone is sufficient motivation to consider such a Lagrangian for the scalar.

Adding a mass term gives the Klein-Gordon equation; that it is a "mass" term (distinguished from other powers of $\phi$ one could add) is shown by quantising the theory and considering scattering. Finally the overall factor of $\frac12$ is a convenience. We could put any constant in front, it won't change the physics.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The Euler-Lagrange equation following from this lagrangian is the Klein-Gordon equation, which is the field theoretical equivalent of the special relativistic energy-mass-momentum equation.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.