2
$\begingroup$

I have seen this question about the law of reflection in special relativity, and it is shown that, if you have a mirror moving in the opposite direction to the mirror's surface normal, the law of reflection doesn't apply anymore. For example, consider the mirror in the $yz$ plane, so that velocity and normal are both on the $x$-axis. But what about the situation where the mirror is moving perpendicularly to the mirror's surface normal? Consider for example the mirror in the $xz$ plane, with the normal on the $y$-axis and the velocity on the $x$-axis. I have done some calculations, and in my solution, the law of reflection does apply in this case. Am I right?

PS: I hope that this is the correct format to ask this question.

EDIT: This is the procedure I have used:

  1. I looked at the first answer to the question that I have linked before.
  2. I applied the same method that is explained there, but with the new projections of velocities.

My results are (using $c = 1$):

$$ \cos(\theta_i) = \frac{\cos(\theta_i')\sqrt{1-v^2}}{1 + v\sin(\theta_i')} \\ \sin(\theta_i) = \frac{\sin(\theta_i') + v}{1 + v\sin(\theta_i')} $$

$cos(\theta_r)$ and $\sin(\theta_r)$ could be derived from the above equations by replacing $\theta_i \to \theta_r$ and $\theta_i' \to \theta_r'$.

In the primed system of reference, $\theta_i' = \theta_r'$, so $\theta_i = \theta_r$. Is this correct? If it isn't, where am I wrong?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I see with pleasure that someone appreciates my questions :o) and is also Italian like me. $\endgroup$
    – Sebastiano
    Commented Sep 7, 2019 at 21:00

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I have done some calculations, and in my solution, the law of reflection does apply in this case. Am I right?

Yes, you're right. However, I offer you to use the following equation that relates the reflected angle to the incident one as measured in $S$ moving at an arbitrary velocity $v$ with respect to the mirror's rest frame ($S^\prime$): (See this article.)

$$\cos \theta_r=\frac{-2\frac{\boldsymbol{\vec{v}_n}}{c}+(1+\frac{\boldsymbol{\vec{v}_n}^2}{c^2})\cos \theta_i}{1-2\frac{\boldsymbol{\vec{v}_n}}{c}\cos \theta_i+\frac{\boldsymbol{\vec{v}_n}^2}{c^2}},$$

where $\boldsymbol{\vec{v}_n}$ is always the velocity vector projection onto the mirror's normal. In your example, when the mirror is set in motion perpendicular to its normal, we have $\boldsymbol{\vec{v}_n}=0$, and thus:

$$\cos \theta_r=\cos \theta_i \rightarrow \theta_r=\theta_i$$

Remember that the light-clock (known as Einstein's light-clock), which is used for deriving the familiar time dilation equation ($t=\gamma t^\prime$), is a good example for your special case: The incident and reflected angles are measured equally by the lab observer as long as the mirror (light-clock) moves perpendicular to its normal.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.