I would like to prove this relation:

$$g^{\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{3!} \frac{1}{g} \epsilon^{\mu\rho\sigma\kappa}\epsilon^{\nu\alpha\beta\gamma} g_{\rho\alpha} g_{\sigma\beta} g_{\kappa\gamma}, \tag{1}$$

with $g_{\mu\nu}$ the metric tensor, $g^{\mu\nu}:=(g^{-1})^{\mu\nu}$ its inverse and $g:= \det g_{\mu\nu}$ its determinant given by:

$$g = \frac{1}{4!} \epsilon^{\mu\rho\sigma\kappa}\epsilon^{\nu\alpha\beta\gamma} g_{\mu\nu} g_{\rho\alpha} g_{\sigma\beta} g_{\kappa\gamma}. \tag{2}$$

I can derive $(1)$ using the trace $g_{\mu\nu} g^{\mu\nu} = 4$, but I am pretty sure that this is not a valid derivation since several matrices can have the same trace. Instead, I would like to use the definition of $g_{\mu\nu}$, which is:

$$g_{\mu\nu} g^{\nu\rho} = \delta_\mu^\rho. \tag{3}$$

But I still have trouble to obtain the identity, since I cannot see where to use it really. I noticed that I can write:

$$1 = \frac{1}{g} g = \frac{1}{g} \frac{1}{4!} \epsilon^{\mu\rho\sigma\kappa}\epsilon^{\nu\alpha\beta\gamma} g_{\rho\alpha} g_{\sigma\beta} g_{\kappa\gamma} g_{\mu\nu} =: \frac{1}{g} \frac{1}{4!} A^{\mu\nu} g_{\mu\nu}, \tag{4}$$

which in matrix notation would be equivalent to:

$$1 = \frac{1}{g} \frac{1}{4!} \text{Tr} (A G). \tag{5}$$

Multiplying both sides by $G^{-1}$, I get:

$$G^{-1} = \frac{1}{g} \frac{1}{4!} \text{Tr} (A G) G^{-1}. \tag{6}$$

Looking at the desired result $(1)$, it seems that the trace should evaluate as $\text{Tr} (AG) G^{-1} = 4 AG G^{-1} = 4 A$, but I don't see how to show that. Doing the same manipulation in index notation, I get the same annoying "lack of connection" between the indices:

$$g^{\lambda\delta} = \frac{1}{g} \frac{1}{4!} \epsilon^{\mu\rho\sigma\kappa}\epsilon^{\nu\alpha\beta\gamma} g_{\rho\alpha} g_{\sigma\beta} g_{\kappa\gamma} g_{\mu\nu} g^{\lambda\delta}. \tag{7}$$

Any suggestion would be appreciated.


Here is one elementary approach to prove eq. (1):

  1. Argue that the RHS transforms as components of a symmetric (2,0) tensor.

  2. Argue that it is enough to prove eq. (1) for $g_{\mu\nu}=\delta_{\mu\nu}$.

  3. Now consider fixed indices $\mu$ and $\nu$.

  4. Case $\mu\neq\nu$: Argue that the RHS must be zero.

  5. Case $\mu=\nu$: Argue that only $3!=6$ combinations of the 6 summation variables $(\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\rho,\sigma,\kappa)$ on the RHS can give non-zero contributions. This explains the $3!=6$ normalization factor on the RHS.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.