1
$\begingroup$

Consider a spring pendulum like in this figure enter image description here

suppose the spring is arranged to lie in a straight line and its equilibrium lenght is $l$.

Consider the unit vectors $e_1, e_2$, $e_x, e_{\theta}$ like here enter image description here

I have some trouble expressing the weight of $m$ and its potential using $e_x, e_{\theta}$.

We have $W=mge_1$ and it seems to me that $e_1 = \cos{\theta}e_x-\sin{\theta}e_{\theta}$, so $W=mg\cos{\theta}e_x-mg\sin{\theta}e_{\theta}$.

Now consider the potential (relative to the weight) $V(x_1, x_2)=-mgx_1$ with $x_1=(x+l)\cos{\theta}$.

We can also write $V(x, \theta)=-mg(x+l)\cos{\theta}$ (or at least this is what my text does) getting $P=-\partial_xVe_x-\partial_{\theta}Ve_{\theta}=mg\cos{\theta}e_x-mg(x+l)\sin{\theta}e_{\theta}$ which is in contradiction with what I wrote above.

Could you help me understand what I'm doing wrong? Thanks

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Your definition of $\nabla$ is wrong. The correct form of $\nabla$ (in polar coordinates) is $\nabla f(r,\theta)=\partial_r f(r,\theta)e_r+{\frac{1}{r}}\partial_{\theta}f(r,\theta)e_{\theta}$ with $r=(x+l)$.

and not

$\nabla f(r,\theta)=\partial_r f(r,\theta)e_r+\partial_{\theta}f(r,\theta)e_{\theta}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.