1
$\begingroup$

For the orbital angular momentum quantum number $\ell=1$, there are three possible $m_\ell$ values, namely, $-1,0$ and $+1$. Which $m_\ell$ value is associated with which of the three p spates, namely, $p_x,p_y$ and $p_z$ and why?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

$m=0$ is the case where the wave function behaves like $\cos \theta$, which is what is commonly referred as $p_z$.

For $p_x,p_y$, you need a superposition of $m=1,-1$: $$ Y_1^{1} + Y_1^{-1} \propto \cos \varphi \sin \theta $$ so one can see that $p_x = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (|1\rangle + |-1 \rangle) $ and in the same matter, $p_y$ will be a superposition with a minus sign.

Hope it helped.

edit: I found a wikipedia page explaining the issue. Here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital#Real_orbitals

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

None of them. The traditional$^*$ approach is to use the operators $\hat H$, $\hat L^2$, and $\hat L_z$ which corresponds to the Hamiltonian (energy), the magnitude of angular momentum, and the z-component of angular momentum. We can specify these three at once because it turns out that these operators commute, so there exists a common eigenbasis we can work in such that the basis vectors are eigenvectors of all three operators.

So the $\ell=1$ you state relates to the eigenvalues of the $\hat L^2$ operator, and the three $m_{\ell}$ values you site deal with three different eigenvalues of the $\hat L_z$ operator. They do not pertain to any single linear component of momentum (since $L_z=xp_y-yp_x$).


$^*$ We technically don't have to work with $\hat L_z$. We could choose any single component of $L$ to work with. By tradition we specify $L_z$, and we can always adjust our coordinates so that the z-axis is in a place to do this.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think he didn't mean momentum but the chemists notation of the three states with $l=1$ $\endgroup$ – Ofek Gillon Nov 2 '18 at 13:48
  • $\begingroup$ @OfekGillon Yes. $\endgroup$ – mithusengupta123 Nov 2 '18 at 13:50
  • $\begingroup$ @mithusengupta123 Oh ok sorry. I am not a chemist :) $\endgroup$ – Aaron Stevens Nov 2 '18 at 13:57
  • $\begingroup$ @AaronStevens , it's ok I also got confused at first. You are welcome to see what are these p orbitals here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital#Real_orbitals . This is also relevant to the OP $\endgroup$ – Ofek Gillon Nov 2 '18 at 14:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.