0
$\begingroup$

I need clarification on the accepted answer in this thread. I don't have reputation to leave comments there.

The vacuum energy for a free field is the ground state energy of each field oscillator, ${1\over 2} \omega$, summed over all the modes. For a cubic periodic box of side-length $L$, you get $$ \sum_k {1\over 2} \sqrt{k^2+m^2} $$ Where the sum is all $k$'s in an infinite size 3D cubic lattice where each $k$ component is an integer multiple of $2\pi\over L$...

How do we get to this sum?
What is $m$? Is it mass? If it is — is it the intrinsic mass?
Why do we square, add and root $k$ and $m$?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Have you seen the equation $E^2 = (cp)^2 + (m c^2)^2$? $\endgroup$
    – DanielSank
    Commented Nov 30, 2017 at 19:19
  • $\begingroup$ How does "k" fit into it? $\endgroup$
    – K. Kirilov
    Commented Nov 30, 2017 at 19:56
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Momenum $p$ is related to the wave vector $k$ by $p = \hbar k$. $\endgroup$
    – DanielSank
    Commented Nov 30, 2017 at 20:03

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

1) What is $m$ and why do we square, add and root $\vec{k}$ and $m$

Remember that free scalar fields in Minkowski spacetime obey the Klein-Gordon equation:

$$\left(\eta^{\mu\nu}\partial_\mu\partial_\nu + m^2\right)\phi = 0, \quad \text{(1)}$$

where $\eta_{\mu\nu}=\text{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1)$ is the Minkowski metric.

One can show that plane waves of positive energy (positive frequency) form a complete set of solutions of $\text{(1)}$:

$$g_\vec{k}(\vec{x},t)=\left(2\pi\right)^{-3/2}\left(2\omega_\vec{k}\right)^{-1/2}\exp{\left[i\left(\vec{k}\cdot \vec{x} -\omega_\vec{k}\,t\right)\right]}, \quad \text{(2)}$$

where

$$\omega_\vec{k}=\left(\vec{k}^2+m^2\right)^{1/2}. \quad \text{(3)}$$

Here, $k^\mu = (\omega_\vec{k},\vec{k})$ is the wave 4-vector associated with the field mode. As DanielSank mentionend, momentum and wave vector are related. The mass $m$ is the mass of the scalar field. As far as I know you can view it as the mass of the particle described by the field.

You can obtain eq. $\text{(3)}$ plugin $\text{(2)}$ into $\text{(1)}$. Also, note that I'm using natural units, i.e., $c=1$ and $\hbar$=1$

2) How do you get a sum over $\omega$

The answer to this question is rather long. I suggest you look for the derivation of the Casimir effect. If you know/are learning QFT you should find it easy to understand where this sum comes from.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.