6
$\begingroup$

What would be the total electric flux $\Phi_E$ through an infinite plane due to a point charge $q$ at a distance $d$ from the plane?

I think it should be $\frac{q}{2\epsilon_0}$, but I cannot justify that. My teacher says the flux is infinite due to the infinite area of the sheet which I cannot believe.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Then why do you think that it should be $q/2\epsilon_{0}$ if you cannot justify it? $\endgroup$
    – Nemo
    Commented Nov 6, 2017 at 14:30
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Well, this may not be proper but I know that from Gauss's law the maximum flux through any closed surface due to a charge $q$ can be $q/\epsilon_0$. Since this is an open infinite surface, I assume that half of all the field lines pass through the plane while the other half don't. Hence my conclusion of $q/2\epsilon_0$. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 6, 2017 at 14:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Good. You're right. $\endgroup$
    – Nemo
    Commented Nov 6, 2017 at 14:41
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Your intuition is partly correct. The actual reason will be clear if you place another infinite plate at a distance $d$ from the plate and $\frac{d}{2}$ from the test charge. Now this can be thought as a closed volume and by symmetry, the flux must be distributed $q/2\epsilon _{0} $ on each plate. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 6, 2017 at 14:42
  • $\begingroup$ Could you draw this? I don't really understand what you mean. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 6, 2017 at 14:57

5 Answers 5

5
$\begingroup$

In general the flux through an oriented open or closed surface $\:\mathrm{S}\:$ due to a point charge $\:Q\:$ is
\begin{equation} \Phi_{\mathrm{S}}=\dfrac{\Theta}{4\pi}\dfrac{Q}{\epsilon_{0}} \tag{01} \end{equation} where $\:\Theta\:$ the solid angle by which the charge $\:Q\:$ sees the surface. In our case this solid angle is half the complete $\:4\pi\:$ solid angle, that is $\:2\pi\:$, so
\begin{equation} \Phi_{\mathrm{S}}=\dfrac{2\pi}{4\pi}\dfrac{Q}{\epsilon_{0}}=\frac12\dfrac{Q}{\epsilon_{0}} \tag{02} \end{equation}

You can find special cases for the solid angles by which a point sees rectangular parallelograms in my answer therein :What is the electric field flux through the base of a cube from a point charge infinitesimally close to a vertex?.

enter image description here

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

The infinite area is a red herring. The electric flux from a point charge does not measure area, because of the inverse-square dependence of the electric field itself; instead, it measures solid angle (a well-known standard fact of electromagnetism), and this is bounded above by $4\pi$, so no regular surface can accumulate infinite flux from a point charge.

If you want, you can show this explicitly through direct integration: putting the charge at $(0,0,d)$ and the plane in the $xy$ plane integrated through polar coordinates, the flux is given by \begin{align} \Phi & = \iint \mathbf E(\mathbf r)\cdot\hat{\mathbf z}\:\mathrm dS \\ & = \int_0^\infty\int_0^{2\pi} \frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{r\hat{\mathbf r}-d\hat{\mathbf z}}{(r^2+d^2)^{3/2}}\cdot\hat{\mathbf z}\:r\:\mathrm d\theta \:\mathrm dr \\ & = -\frac{qd}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int_0^\infty\frac{r}{(r^2+d^2)^{3/2}}\mathrm dr , \end{align} which is easily seen to converge (and which can, moreover, be integrated explicitly with the substitution $r=d\tan(\phi)$ to give the primitive $d/(r^2+d^2)^{1/2}$).

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ The trig substitution isn’t necessary; the substitution $r^2+d^2=t$ can also be performed. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 3 at 15:41
1
$\begingroup$

Consider a Gaussian surface in the shape of an infinite cuboid with $2$ faces as infinite sheets with separation $2d$ and the other $4$ faces at infinity with the charge $Q$ at the centre of the cuboid(,i.e., at a distance of $d$ from both the infinite sheets).

Then, by Gauss’ law, if the flux through an infinite sheet due to $Q$ is $\Phi$, by symmetry, the flux through each infinite sheet comprising $2$ faces of the cuboid will be $\Phi$ and through the rest of the faces will be zero as electric field dude to $Q$ is zero at infinity:

$$2\Phi+4\times0=\frac{Q}{\epsilon_0}$$ $$\therefore\boxed{\Phi=\frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0}}$$

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Consider the result for the electric flux $\Phi$ through a square sheet of side $2a$ due to a point charge $Q$ placed on its axis at a distance $d$ from its centre:

$$\Phi=\frac{Q}{\pi\epsilon_0}\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{a^2}{a^2+d^2}\right)$$

In the given question, it is clear that $a=\infty$, hence:

$$\Phi=\lim_{a\to\infty} \frac{Q}{\pi\epsilon_0}\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{a^2}{a^2+d^2}\right) $$ $$\therefore\boxed{\Phi=\frac{Q}{2\epsilon_0}}$$

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ consider putting both your answers into one. $\endgroup$
    – paulina
    Commented Dec 3 at 20:08
  • $\begingroup$ @paulina I have followed the guidelines of this thread. If I did something wrong, please let me know as I am new to answering questions on PSE. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 4 at 2:00
-1
$\begingroup$

I think its answer is $q/\epsilon_0$ where $\epsilon_0$ is permittivity of free space. Because when flux through gaussian surface enclosing charge $q$ is $q/\epsilon_0$ and flux through any body near to this charge like plane in this case will be of course $q/\epsilon_0$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Your answer is incorrect because the plane is not a gaussian surface enclosing the charge $q$. You will understand this looking in the Figure titled "Solid angles" in my answer. From the $\Theta=2\pi$ example the point $Q$ "sees" the "south" hemisphere and the plane underneath it by the same solid angle. And this solid angle is $\Theta=2\pi$ $\endgroup$
    – Voulkos
    Commented Aug 8, 2019 at 23:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.