0
$\begingroup$

Consider grand canonical partition function $Z = \prod_{k} \left(1-e^{-\beta(\varepsilon_k-\mu)}\right)^{-1}$ for an ideal Bose-gas in a trapping potential with energy levels $\varepsilon_k$ and chemical potential $\mu$. I try to find the fluctuation in particle number $\delta n_k^2$ with this equation:

$$\delta n_k^2 = \frac{1}{\beta^2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial^2\mu} \log Z_k $$

What I find is the following surprising result:

$$ \delta n_k^2 = \left\langle n_k \right\rangle^2 + \left\langle n_k \right\rangle $$

this means that the number particle fluctuation is greater than mean occupation number, namely: $\delta n_k > \left\langle n_k \right\rangle $ $\forall \varepsilon_k$.

My question: this is clearly unphysical, is there a relative simple way to compute the correct mean particle number fluctuation $\delta n_k^2$ ?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

This is a completely correct result. If there is no condensate, then $\langle n_k\rangle\ll1$ for almost all the states. Then the total fluctuation in particle number would be, $$\langle \Delta N^2\rangle\sim N$$ So, $$\frac{\sqrt{\langle \Delta N^2\rangle}}{N}\sim\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\rightarrow0\quad\text{as}\quad N\rightarrow\infty$$ So, it does not give any absurd or weird results. If we have a condensate, then the fluctuations in the ground state, where all the particles crowd into, would be of $\mathcal{O}(1)$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.