0
$\begingroup$

The classical partition function for an open system is given as $$ Z_{\text{max}} = \sum_{N=0}^{\infty} \dfrac{h^{-N}}{N! } \prod_{j=1}^{N} \left( \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} e^{-\beta (E_{ij}-\mu)} g_{i} \right) $$ where $E_{ij}$ is $j$th particle with in the $j$th energy state, $g_i$ is the degenecery of the $i$th energy state, $\mu$ is the chemical potential, and $N!$ is removes over-counting of indistinguishable particles.

The Bose-Einstein partition function is given as $$ Z_{\text{bos}} = \prod_{j=1}^{\infty} \left( \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} e^{-\beta (E_{j}-\mu)i} \right)^{g_{j}} $$ where $j$ is evaluates all possible energies and $g_j$ is the degeneracies of the energies.

Why is it fundamentally impossible to reduce $Z_{\text{max}}$ into $Z_{\text{bos}}$, even though both systems describe particle number as not conserved? The average number of particles of both systems is given as $$ \langle N \rangle = \dfrac{1}{\beta} \dfrac{\partial \ln(Z)}{\partial \mu } $$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ crosspost to movies.stackexchange.com? $\endgroup$ – arivero Aug 12 '15 at 21:40
2
$\begingroup$

Fundamentally it is that the $1/N!$ for the classical system only correctly compensates for overcounting of indistinguishable states if the particles are always in different states. For a system of Bosons at low temperature, where it is quite likely that many particles are in the same state, this breaks down. For a very understandable introduction to this I highly recommend the chapter on quantum statistics in the excellent thermal physics textbook by Schroeder.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.