6
$\begingroup$

It is well-known that the operator $$\delta \mathcal{L}_{QCD}=\frac{\theta}{32\pi^2}F_{\mu\nu a}\tilde{F}^{\mu\nu a}$$ violates CP, it can contribute to the neutron electric dipole moment, $d_n$. For example, see the opening statement here.

The $\theta$-term interaction is an interaction between gluons, and it's reasonable that it affects the property of nucleons. But I don't understand how can gluonic interactions induce electric dipole moment of the neutron. What does strong interaction have to do with electric dipole moment?

$\endgroup$
1

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

The term $F_{\mu\nu}\tilde{F}^{\mu\nu}$ can be written as $\vec{E}\cdot\vec{B}$, with $\vec{E}$ and $\vec{B}$ the so-called chromoelectric/magnetic fields (which you can think of as the strong force versions of their classical counterparts).

A derivation of the nEDM can be found here (beware: it is quite long and tedious).

As you mention, $\theta F\tilde{F}$ violates $\textsf{CP}$ and allows for processes such as those depicted below, which in turn mean non-zero nEDM.

CP violation -> nEDM

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The actual reason is that the operator $F_{\mu\nu}^{a}\tilde{F}^{\mu\nu,a}$ in general has non-zero matrix element $$ \tag 1 \lim_{\mathbf p' \to \mathbf p}\langle N(\mathbf p')| F^{a}_{\mu\nu}\tilde{F}^{\mu\nu,a}|N(\mathbf p)\rangle = i\mu \bar{N}(\mathbf p)\gamma_{5}N(\mathbf p), $$ where $N$ is the nucleon state and $\mu$ is dimensional constant. The same argument applies for the matrix element $$ \tag 2 \lim_{\mathbf p' \to \mathbf p}\langle N(\mathbf p')|F^{a}_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu,a}|N(\mathbf p) \rangle \simeq m_{N}\bar{N}(\mathbf p)N(\mathbf p), $$ making actually one of main contributions in the nucleon mass.

Although $(1)$ looks reasonable, it is of course hard to evaluate it for getting the value of $\mu$, because it is non-perturbative. However, here can be used the chiral anomaly: any chiral transformation $$ q_{f} \to e^{i\alpha_{f}\gamma_{5}}q_{f}, \quad f = u,d,s $$ generates the shift $\theta \to \theta + 2\alpha_{f}$. Therefore it is possible to eliminate the $\theta$-term with appearing the phase in the quark mass matrix: $$ M_{q} \to M_{q}\cdot \text{diag}\big(\text{exp}\left[2i\alpha_{u}\gamma_{5}\right],\text{exp}\left[2i\alpha_{d}\gamma_{5}\right],\text{exp}\left[2i\alpha_{s}\gamma_{5}\right]\big) $$ It's then possible to realize that for small $\theta$ the phases matrix generates the shift $$ \bar{q}M_{q}q \to \bar{q}M_{q}q + i\theta \frac{m_{u}m_{d}m_{s}}{m_{u}m_{d}+m_{d}m_{s}+m_{u}m_{s}}\bar{q}\gamma_{5}q, $$ which effectively defines $\mu$ (up to numerical factor).

Once $(1)$ is derived, it's simple to obtain the dipole term. Classically, the dipole moment $d$ is defined through the hamiltonian $$ H_{\text{EDM}} = d(\mathbf E \cdot \mathbf S), $$ where $S$ is the spin operator and $\mathbf E$ is electric field. By using $(1)$, one realizes that one just needs to generate the operator $$ L_{\text{EDM}} = d\cdot \bar{n}i\sigma_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}n $$ This can be done only through the proton and pion fields, since the neutron doesn't have the tree-level coupling to photons. The latter is purely technical thing.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.