1
$\begingroup$

I have an $n$- state system with energy values $0$, $2 \epsilon$, $3 \epsilon$, $\dots$, $n \epsilon$. I need to find the average energy $\langle E\rangle$.

I proceeded as follows:

The probability that the energy is $s\epsilon$ is

$$\frac{e^{-s\epsilon}}{\sum_{l= 0}^{n} e^{-l \beta \epsilon}}$$

where $\beta \equiv \frac{1}{k_B T}$

The denominator is a geometric series with $n + 1$ terms and ratio $e^{-\beta \epsilon}$

Hence the probability is $\frac{1- e^{-\beta \epsilon}}{1-e^{-(n+1)\beta \epsilon}}e^{-\beta s \epsilon}$

So the expected energy $\langle E \rangle$ is:

$$\frac{1- e^{-\beta \epsilon}}{1-e^{-(n+1)\beta \epsilon}} \sum_{s=0}^{n}s\epsilon e^{-\beta s \epsilon}$$ which equals

$$-\frac{1- e^{-\beta \epsilon}}{1-e^{-(n+1)\beta \epsilon}}\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} \sum_{s=0}^{n} e^{-\beta s \epsilon}$$

The sum is evaluated as that of a geometric series and differentiated w.r.t $\beta$.

Is this the correct approach to the problem?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ The angled-delimiters \langle and rangle typeset without the added space the comparative operators < and > have. $\endgroup$ Commented May 29, 2017 at 18:39

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Its the right idea, but a little over-complicated. Actually Wikipdia shows explains it nicely:

$$\langle E\rangle =\sum_s E_s P_s =\frac{1}{Z}\sum_sE_s e^{-\beta E_s}=-\frac{1}{Z}\frac{\partial}{\partial \beta}Z=-\frac{\partial \ln Z}{\partial \beta }$$

The difference between your calculation and the one above is that in the one above the partition function is not exlicitly calculated until the end.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.