7
$\begingroup$

If a bipartite state on $H^A \otimes H^B$ is maximally entangled, does the dimension of $H^A$ have to equal to the dimension of $H^B$? If it need not, (in my own very abstract terms), shouldn't the larger Hilbert space have more "structure" in it to form correlations/entanglement with other systems, thus violating the monogamy of (maximum) entanglement?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

This boils down to what you mean by "maximal entanglement". Usually, you define maximal entanglement by saying that both reduced density matrices are proportional to the identity. However, if the system consists of two parts with unequal dimension, this is impossible to happen.

Here is why: Given $|\psi\rangle \in \mathcal{H}_A\otimes \mathcal{H}_B$, you can write it as $|\psi\rangle = \sum_{i=1}^k \sqrt{\lambda_i} |i_A\rangle\otimes |i_B\rangle$ where $|i_A\rangle,|i_B\rangle$ form part of an orthonormal basis of $\mathcal{H}_A$ and $\mathcal{H}_B$ respectively (this is known as the Schmidt decomposition).

Now, if you compute the reduced density matrices, you will find that they are given by

$$\rho_A = \sum_i \lambda_i |i_A\rangle\langle i_A|$$

$$\rho_B = \sum_i \lambda_i |i_B\rangle\langle i_B|.$$

Just seeing this, it should be clear that we have a problem if the dimension of $\mathcal{H}_A$ and $\mathcal{H}_B$ do not match: The two matrices have equal rank hence not both of them can have full rank. It is easy to see that the maximal entanglement entropy between the two systems is reached if $\lambda_i=\lambda_j$ for all $j$. The amount is then given by the dimension of the smaller system.

In other words: As you suspect the maximal entanglement of the combined system is dictated by the smaller system and there is "room" in the larger system. The two systems can, however, not be maximally entangled in the usual sense and there is no violation of monogamy.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ You (presumably) mean it's impossible for both reduced density matrices to be proportional to the identity. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 19, 2016 at 23:00
  • $\begingroup$ @Martin Regarding your expression for the $|\psi>$, is that like a general form for maximally entangled bipartite states? Given that, I was able to derive the reduced density matrices. My knowledge on rank is a little hazy- studied it a long time back. $\rho_A$ is a diagonal matrix. Doesn't this mean it has full rank if $|i_A>$'s are expressed in the computational basis? Same for $\rho_B$. I am also not very familiar with entanglement entropy. Could you please elaborate a bit on the role that rank plays here and its connection with maximum entropy? $\endgroup$
    – Matrix23
    Commented Dec 20, 2016 at 0:33
  • $\begingroup$ @IanDsouza You should read up on the Schmidt decomposition. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 20, 2016 at 2:17
  • $\begingroup$ @NorbertSchuch Thanks for that. I'll look into it. $\endgroup$
    – Matrix23
    Commented Dec 20, 2016 at 4:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.