I am working on a question from my practice exam. We are asked if the following equation is a valid expression of Euler's equation - an approximation to Navier Stokes for high Reynold's number.
$$\cfrac{D\rho V}{Dt} = -\nabla P + \rho g$$
I don't believe so. The Navier stokes equation should be written as:
$$\rho \cfrac{DV}{Dt} = -\nabla P + [\nabla \cdot \tau] + \rho g$$
This equation simplifies to the following in the case of high Reynold's number.
$$\rho \cfrac{DV}{Dt} = -\nabla P + \rho g$$
However, a careful derivation of Navier Stokes indicates that the rho must exist outside of the substantive derivative. Therefore, it is my belief that the equation we are given is distinctly wrong. Is my intuition correct here?