3
$\begingroup$

It's often written in the QI literature that, for a density operator $\rho$, if $\text{Tr}\left[\rho^{2}\right] < 1$, then $\rho$ describes a mixed state. However, I haven't seen any proofs of this except in the case where the states are in $\rho$ are orthonormal, i.e., if $$\rho = \sum_{i}p_{i}|\psi_{i}\rangle\langle \psi_{i}|$$

then all the proofs I have seen only apply when $\langle \psi_{i}|\psi_{j}\rangle = \delta_{ij}$. I have written what I think is a proof for the case when that does not hold, but it feels very simple and I wanted feedback on whether or not it is rigorous. Here is the proof (note that $|\phi_{k}\rangle$ just denotes an element of some orthonormal basis on the space of quantum states): $$\text{Tr}\left[\rho^{2}\right] = \text{Tr}\left[\sum_{i,j}p_{i}p_{j}|\psi_{i}\rangle\langle\psi_{i}|\psi_{j}\rangle\langle\psi_{j}|\right] = \sum_{i,j,k}p_{i}p_{j}\langle\psi_{i}|\psi_{j}\rangle\langle\phi_{k}|\psi_{i}\rangle\langle\psi_{j}|\phi_{k}\rangle$$ $$=\sum_{i,j}p_{i}p_{j}|\langle\psi_{i}|\psi_{j}\rangle|^{2} < \sum_{i,j}p_{i}p_{j} = 1$$

The inequality comes from my assumption that this is a mixed state, not a pure state. I think this must be rigorous, but if the proof is really this simple why can't I find it published anywhere...? Maybe I'm overthinking this, but confirmation that this reasoning is correct (or corrections to it) would be much appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ A pure state has a density matrix $\rho = \vert \rangle \langle \vert$, which has $\rho ^2=\rho$ and trace $=1$. Am I missing something? $\endgroup$ – pppqqq Nov 10 '16 at 22:07
  • $\begingroup$ The point is to check that trace($\rho^{2}$) < 1 for mixed states that sum over a set of non-orthonormal quantum states. I understand the pure state case. $\endgroup$ – miggle Nov 10 '16 at 22:56
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ A Hermitian matrix is guaranteed to have a decomposition into orthogonal eigenvectors. Just use that decomposition instead of the non-orthogonal one. $\endgroup$ – Craig Gidney Nov 11 '16 at 2:29
  • $\begingroup$ Umm OK, I'll need to think about that a little. I can hit $\rho^{2}$ with unitaries to make it diagonal but I need to think about what the coefficients in the expansion of $\rho^{2}$ will look like. $\endgroup$ – miggle Nov 11 '16 at 4:34
  • $\begingroup$ @CraigGidney, could you write something a little more detailed? I understand your comment, but I can't see how I can relate the expansion coefficients in the basis where $\rho^{2}$ is diagonal to the original $p_{i}$ which obey the nice normalization condition. $\endgroup$ – miggle Nov 11 '16 at 5:58
0
$\begingroup$

Pure States : Consider an ensemble of given objects in the states $\{ |\psi_i\rangle \}$. If all the objects are in the same state, the ensemble is represented by a pure state. To make probabilistic statements the whole ensemble of identically prepared systems must be considered. Let the system be in state $|\psi\rangle$, then the density matrix is given by $$\rho = |\psi\rangle\langle\psi|$$ $$\rho^2 = |\psi\rangle\langle\psi|\psi\rangle\langle\psi| = |\psi\rangle\langle\psi| = \rho$$ Taking trace both sides: $$Tr(\rho^2)=Tr(\rho)=1$$ Mixed States : Let us next study the situation where not all of the N systems (objects) of the ensemble are in the same state, i.e. Ni systems are in the state $|\psi_i\rangle$ respectively, such that 􏰘 $N_i = N$. The probability pi to find an individual system of the ensemble described by the state $|\psi_i\rangle$ is then given by: $$p_i = \frac{N_i}{N}\quad \mbox{where} \quad \sum_ip_i = 1$$ Therefore we can write mixed state in terms of weighted sum of pure states: $$\rho_{mix} = \sum_ip_i\rho_i^{pure} = \sum_ip_i|\psi_i\rangle\langle\psi_i|$$ $$\rho^2 = \sum_ip_i|\psi_i\rangle\langle\psi_i| \sum_jp_j|\psi_j\rangle\langle\psi_j|$$ $$\rho^2=\sum_{i,j}p_ip_j|\psi_i\rangle\langle\psi_i|\psi_j\rangle\langle\psi_j|=\sum_{i,j}p_ip_j|\psi_i\rangle\langle\psi_j|\delta_{ij} = \sum_ip_i^2|\psi_i\rangle\langle\psi_i|\neq \rho$$ Since $p_i^2 < p_i$, therefore $Tr(\rho^2) < Tr(\rho)$

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is not an answer to the question. $\endgroup$ – Norbert Schuch Aug 24 '18 at 13:09
0
$\begingroup$

The (statistical) density matrix describing a system is defined as $$\rho = \sum_ip_i\left|\psi_i\right\rangle\left\langle\psi_i\right|$$ where $p_i$ is the probability that the system is in state $\left|\psi_i\right\rangle$. Notice that it is not necessary for $\left|\psi_i\right\rangle$ to be an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian; they can be a superposition of eigenstates. Hence, in general, one assumes that $\left|\psi_i\right\rangle$ are normalized but not orthogonal.

If the system is in a pure state, all $p_i=0$ except one value. Otherwise, it is in a mixed state, i.e. there exists at least two nonzero values of $p_i$.

The inequality in your solution can be proved using Schwarz inequality $$\sum_{i,j}p_ip_j|\left\langle\psi_i|\psi_j\right\rangle|^2\le\sum_{i,j}p_ip_j\left\langle\psi_i|\psi_i\right\rangle\left\langle\psi_j|\psi_j\right\rangle = \sum_ip_i\sum_jp_j=1.$$ The equality holds only when $\left|\psi_j\right\rangle=\left|\psi_j\right\rangle$ for all $i$ and $j$, which means that there is no summation, or the system is in a pure state. Therefore, for mixed states, $\text{Tr}(\rho^2)<1$. Notice that in this derivation, one only employed the normalization of $\left|\psi_j\right\rangle$, not the orthogonality property.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.