0
$\begingroup$

My question is simple : we use Hemloltz free energy "A" to study equilibrium of system under transformation at T and N constants.

We have A=E-T.S, but dA=dE-TdS-SdT

Why is the differential dT dependent as we construct this function to study equilibrium for system where the temperature is imposed ?

[edit] : More detailed question :

In fact what I understood is that for any system where the external work is only done by pressure forces we have :

$$ dU+PdV-TdS < 0$$ (it comes from first principle and using the fact that $dS=\frac{\delta Q}{T} + \delta S^c$ with $ \delta S^c > 0$).

And we define a thermodynamic potential $ \Phi $ as $d \Phi = dU+PdV-TdS$. The equilibrium will then be done if $ d \Phi =0$

It is not possible to define a general $ \Phi $, but if we work in (T,V,N) ($dT=dV=dN=0$), we have : $ d \Phi = dU+PdV-TdS = d(U-T S)$, so $ \Phi = A = U-T S$.

Then to construct F we assumed $dT=0$, so why do we consider after that $dT$ is not equal to 0 ? I don't get the logic.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Nobody has an idea (I don't know how to up a post) ? $\endgroup$ – StarBucK Sep 23 '16 at 11:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ We didn't assume dT=0 to "construct" F. We just defined F = U - TS. This definition certainly does not require fixed temperature. Now, it's true that the statement $dF \leq 0$ is true for systems coupled to a thermal bath of fixed temperature, but that doesn't mean that we can't still talk about the temperature dependence of $F$. $\endgroup$ – Dominic Else Sep 24 '16 at 14:00
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah what I meant is to define F=U-TS we putted dT=0 in dU+PdV-TdS to find F=U-TS But indeed we can make T dependent it is just that if F is T dependent then the condition F=Fmin at equilibrium will not be true. Thank you $\endgroup$ – StarBucK Sep 24 '16 at 15:09
0
$\begingroup$

Because when you differ, you want to know the difference in energy between two states that feature different thermodynamic conditions. The A is energy given a particular N,V,T tuple. That means that A actually depend on that tuple and when you want to compute the difference in A between two different NVT tuples you have to define A as a function of NVT:

$$\mathrm dA = -\,p~\mathrm dV + S~\mathrm dT + X~\mathrm d\mu$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think my question wasn't precised enough, I edited my main post to give more details on what I don't understand. To summarise : I can understand that we want to compute the difference in A between two different N V T systems but the logic of construction of A does'nt follow the same logic so I don't get it (to construct it we assume $dT=0$). $\endgroup$ – StarBucK Sep 22 '16 at 18:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.