2
$\begingroup$

The conventional means of obtaining uncertainty of $c$ where $c = a \cdot b$ is adding percentage uncertainty of $a$ and $b$. This method seems to have a flaw as shown below (please excuse me if I am yet to get to the correction in my studies).

You have a square and a very bad ruler and want to find the area of the square. You find that the dimensions of the square are $L = 4\;\mathrm{cm} \pm 2\;\mathrm{cm}$ and $W = 4\;\mathrm{cm} \pm 2\;\mathrm{cm}$. The percentage uncertainty for each of these measurements is $50\%$, you add the two $50\%$ uncertainties to get $100\%$ percentage uncertainty. $$ A = 16\;\mathrm{cm}^2 \pm 16\;\mathrm{cm}^2 $$ I was wondering if there was a method of correction to avoid problems like these arising.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ The possible results range from 4 to 36, not 0 to 32. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 19, 2016 at 4:09

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

The problem you encounter is that you are applying the rule that is applicable to "linear addition" of uncertainty, to non-linear applications (multiplication).

Valid application .. $(4 \frac{+}{-}2)$ + $(8 \frac{+}{-}3) = 12 \frac{+}{-}5 $ (7 -> 17 range)
Invalid application $(4 \frac{+}{-}2)$ x $(8 \frac{+}{-}3) = 32 \frac{+}{-}? $

To obtain the correct answer, when multiplying, you have to use the rules of multiplication, which will give you: $(4 \frac{+}{-}2)$ x $(8 \frac{+}{-}3) = 32 \frac{+34}{-22} $ (10 -> 66 range).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.