Can anyone help me understand what exactly is meant by phase-matching? I want to know whether momentum can be conserved only under phase-matching condition. Does momentum conservation ensure efficient transfer of energy between waves? Also, how is phase matching related to various matrix elements of susceptibility?
5
-
$\begingroup$ uh, you linked a google search? $\endgroup$– anon01Commented Apr 4, 2016 at 16:42
-
$\begingroup$ momentum conservation is true whether or not a phase matching condition is met. You may want to ask a single, specific question about phase matching to get a good answer. $\endgroup$– anon01Commented Apr 4, 2016 at 16:44
-
1$\begingroup$ "Momentum is conserved, as is necessary for phase-matching" (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-phase-matching) Please explain this. Thanks $\endgroup$– Aswin AlexCommented Apr 4, 2016 at 17:53
-
2$\begingroup$ You'll get a better answer if you tell us what the context is, what you know, and what confuses you. In nonlinear optics, you generally want your field to build up. For that, the two waves have to have the same phase. If not, there will be alternating growth and reduction of the field, resulting in almost no output. $\endgroup$– garypCommented Apr 4, 2016 at 19:43
-
$\begingroup$ I want to understand the interaction between the various waves inside a non-linear crystal with a space-time picture. Is phase matching a condition which will sustain an efficient transfer of energy between waves throughout the non-linear crystal? Should momentum be conserved at each instant of time everywhere inside the crystal? If yes, is this the reason why phase matching requirement is imposed for efficient transfer of energy? $\endgroup$– Aswin AlexCommented Apr 5, 2016 at 4:56
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
To understand the phase matching concept I recommend you to do the calculus of the wave equation as explained in Boyd's book (Nonlinear optics - The wave equation for nonlinear optical media). You might also find them in every nonlinear optics course but I think they are well explained in Boyd's book.
Phase matching in general is used meaning momentum conservation. It can be explained by the fact that in the calculus the momentum conservation leads to the phase matching equation. But there is a strong difference in the use of the two equations. Experimentally both will be usefull and influence the efficiency of the frequency conversion.
The momentum conservation will impact on the angles of the differents waves and depends on the matrix elements of susceptibility.
The phase conservation or phase matching is more subtil and depends on the nonlinear process . For second harmonic generation it is an automatic process. But in Difference Frequency Generation or Sum frequency generation, the sign of the different phases will determinate the sign of the energy transfer. I give you an exemple:
For sum frequency generation ($\omega_1+\omega_2=\omega_3$) $\Delta\phi=\phi_3-\phi_2-\phi_1$. If $\Delta\phi=-\pi/2$ the energy transfer will occur from $\omega_3$ to $\omega_2$ and $\omega_1$ making photon split. If $\Delta\phi=+\pi/2$ the energy transfer will occur from $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$ to $\omega_3$ making photon merger.
Between the two cases the efficiency of one of the two process will decrease. If the phase matching relation tells you that $\phi_3=\pi/2+\phi_1+\phi_2$. The phase $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ are given by your optical sources at $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$. But if you add a signal at $\omega_3$ to stimulate the nonlinear process it will deteriorate the efficiency if $\phi_3$ is not exactly the phase given by the phase matching condition.
