A circus acrobat of mass $M$ leaps straight up with initial velocity $v_{0}$ from a trampoline. As he rises up, he takes a trained monkey of mass $m$ off a perch at a height $h$ above the trampoline. What is the maximum height attained by the pair?

Center of Mass

Initially the center of mass(CM) is at $y_{0} = \dfrac{mh}{M+m}$. The only force on the CM is gravity and its initial velocity is $\dfrac{Mv_{0}}{M+m}$. So it is going to reach its highest point traveling a distance of $\dfrac{M^{2}v_{0}^{2}}{2(M+m)^{2}g}$ from its initial position $y_{0}$. This leaves the pair at a final distance of $\dfrac{mh}{M+m} + \dfrac{M^{2}v_{0}^{2}}{2(M+m)^{2}g}$ above the ground

Conservation of Energy

Initial Energy of the pair, $E_{0} = \frac{1}{2}Mv_{0}^{2} + mgh$ Final Energy of the pair, $E_{1} = (M+m)gH$, where $H$ is the maximum height above the ground that the pair reaches.

By conservation of energy, $E_{0} = E_{1} \implies (M+m)gH = \frac{1}{2}MV_{0}^{2} + mgh \implies H = \dfrac{Mv_{0}^{2} + 2mgh}{2(M+m)g}$

Conservation of momentum

At a height of $h$, the velocity of M is $v = \sqrt{v_{0}^{2} - 2gh}$. Just after picking up the monkey, the velocity of the pair, $v^{'}$ is given by $Mv = (M+m)v^{'}$ (Why should the momentum be conserved for the acrobat-monkey system?), they will go on to a height of $\dfrac{v^{'2}}{2g}$ from here.

The three approaches don't seem to tally. Where am I wrong?


3 Answers 3


The two first methods assume that the collision between the monkey and the acrobat is elastic, which is clearly not the case.

The third method uses simple kinematic equations. More importantly, the calculation gets past the collision part of the process using conservation of momentum, which does hold for this collision.

  • $\begingroup$ Though an elastic collision between a monkey and an acrobat would be hilarious. $\endgroup$
    – Neil
    Commented Mar 8, 2016 at 7:48
  • $\begingroup$ Subtle point about why momentum is conserved! $\endgroup$
    – buzaku
    Commented Mar 8, 2016 at 9:22
  • $\begingroup$ Does the conservation of momentum here serve as a best model of approximation given the short interaction time between the objects? Or am I missing a subtlety on the validity of momentum conservation itself? $\endgroup$
    – buzaku
    Commented Mar 8, 2016 at 14:47

Momentum Conservation can be applied (approximately) along the $y$-axis!

The reason is not so obvious. We can never conserve momentum along $y$-axis because gravity is always there to provide a force in the $y$-axis of our system (jumper+monkey); hence momentum conservation is invalid.

But we know something about gravity, that it does not play a significant role in very short intervals of time, and does not change the momentum of the system appreciably in that small period. But do note that the change is the momentum is very small, but it's not equal to zero!

So with this reasoning, one can apply momentum conservation provided that the time interval is super small.


Correct application of Newton's second law leads to the correct answer. Here's the full solution Schematic of the scene

Initial Conditions from given information


Final answer

  • $\begingroup$ Please type out your answer and use MathJax for equations, instead of just inserting images. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 12 at 13:00
  • $\begingroup$ OK. I'm new to this website. I am not aware of mathjax. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 12 at 17:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.